MEMS Valve Actuator for Dynamic Impact Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for protecting human body parts from impact injuries are often 'one-size-fits-all' solutions, failing to customize protection based on individual acceleration patterns, which limits their effectiveness in various high-risk activities.

Innovation Solution

A Micro-electro-mechanical-system (MEMS) valve actuator system using piezoelectric components and electronic control modules to control fluid flow in actively adjustable pads, integrating sensors for real-time acceleration data to tailor impact mitigation based on individual kinematic and fluid dynamics models.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional one-size-fits-all protection systems are used, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability to individual acceleration patterns deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to individual acceleration patternsVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The protection system transitions from static, fixed protection to dynamic, real-time adjustment of fluid pressure based on sensed acceleration patterns. The valve actuator system dynamically modulates fluid flow to adapt the protection level to individual acceleration patterns during impact events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates sensors that detect acceleration patterns and feed this information back to the control system, which then adjusts the valve actuator to modify fluid pressure accordingly. This closed-loop feedback enables real-time adaptation to individual acceleration patterns while maintaining manageable complexity through automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Object-affected harmful factors

If fluid pressure is increased to enhance impact protection, then protection effectiveness is improved, but the risk of over-pressurization injury worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact protection effectivenessVSAvoidover-pressurization injury risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes the fluid pressure parameter in real-time based on detected acceleration patterns. By monitoring impact characteristics and adjusting pressure levels accordingly, the system provides enhanced protection during actual impacts while avoiding sustained over-pressurization that could cause injury.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The valve actuator system applies periodic or pulsed fluid pressure adjustments rather than continuous high pressure. This allows the system to deliver protective pressure bursts during impact events while returning to lower pressure states between events, preventing over-pressurization injury.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Weight of moving object

If miniaturized MEMS components are used, then device weight is reduced, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice weightVSAvoidmanufacturing precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces traditional mechanical protection components with miniaturized MEMS valve actuators and electronic sensors. This substitution enables significant weight reduction while the precision is achieved through advanced micro-fabrication techniques and integrated circuit manufacturing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides personalized impact reduction by dynamically adjusting fluid pressure and flow to minimize acceleration effects, enhancing protection for specific body parts during impacts without adding excessive weight or cost.

Implementation Method 1

a semiconductor substrate comprised of a sandwich made from two or more piezo-electric components

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoelectric effect: Piezoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS10869519B2MEMS valve actuator system and method
Publication Date: 2020.12.22 BARRETT JR RAYMOND LOUIS
  • US10869519B2 patent drawing
  • US10869519B2 patent drawing
  • US10869519B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A micro-electro-mechanical (MEMS) exhaust valve-based impact attenuating fluid filled cell for use in cushioning impact and decelerating of a wearer's body portion (e.g. head, shoulder, torso, etc.) after an impact. In combination with the use of accelerometers, pressure sensors, location and other electronics supply signals to a microcontroller, the controlled opening/closing of said exhaust valve (resulting in the expelling of said fluids with an optional combination with cell refill means) when certain parameters exceed a threshold. Individuals who engage in activities that carry a risk of injury to the head from impact in the normal course of the activity could, in combination with regular exams, benefit from a system that produces and updates a kinematic 3D model of the individual's head, including brain matter, cerebrospinal fluid paths, arterial and venous blood flow pathways, as well as the skull, supporting connective tissues and other biological structures in the head suitable for interaction with exogenous stimuli prepared from hypothetical or actual recorded impact events.