3D-Printed Meniscus Scaffold With Radial-Circumferential Filaments

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current treatments for meniscus injuries, such as partial meniscectomy and synthetic polymer scaffolds, fail to provide consistent mechanical properties and are labor-intensive, limiting their effectiveness in replacing damaged meniscal tissue of various shapes and sizes.

Innovation Solution

A resorbable scaffold with a polymer filament network, comprising alternating layers of circumferentially-oriented and radially-oriented filaments, is fabricated using 3D printing, allowing customization to fit specific meniscal defects and infused with a matrix material like collagen-hyaluronic acid, maintaining mechanical properties during cutting and shaping.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If continuous fiber weaving is used to create fiber-reinforced scaffold, then mechanical strength is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases and customization is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical strengthVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The continuous fiber structure is segmented into discrete printed filaments arranged in alternating circumferential and radial layers. This segmentation allows the scaffold to be manufactured layer-by-layer using 3D printing, reducing manufacturing complexity while maintaining the load-distributing functionality of fiber reinforcement through digitally controlled filament placement patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The manufacturing method transitions from mechanical weaving of continuous fibers to additive 3D printing with controlled deposition parameters. By changing the manufacturing parameters (temperature, deposition rate, layer thickness), the system achieves both mechanical strength and design flexibility, allowing customization of filament orientation and density without complex weaving machinery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If fiber-reinforced scaffold is cut into desired shape, then adaptability to different defect geometries is improved, but mechanical properties deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to defect geometriesVSAvoidmechanical properties
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The scaffold is manufactured with the final customized geometry directly through 3D printing, eliminating the need for post-manufacturing cutting. The digital model is sliced into layers and printed in the exact shape required, so the alternating filament layers are deposited only where needed. This preliminary shaping action preserves mechanical properties by avoiding cuts that would disrupt the fiber reinforcement pattern.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The design moves from 2D fiber weaving patterns to 3D printed alternating layers of circumferential and radial filaments. This dimensional transition allows the scaffold to achieve complex curved geometries and variable thickness profiles directly in manufacturing, adapting to different defect shapes while maintaining structural integrity through controlled material deposition in three-dimensional space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Ease of manufacture

If synthetic polymer scaffolds are used for meniscus replacement, then ease of manufacture is improved, but mechanical properties and tissue regeneration consistency worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidtissue regeneration consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The scaffold uses composite construction with alternating layers of circumferential and radial polymer filaments embedded in a collagen-hyaluronic acid matrix. This composite structure provides the mechanical strength needed for load-bearing while the porous matrix enables tissue ingrowth and regeneration. The combination maintains ease of manufacture through 3D printing while improving reliability by creating a structure that both supports mechanical loads and promotes consistent fibrocartilage formation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The scaffold incorporates a porous collagen-hyaluronic acid matrix between the polymer filament layers, creating channels for nutrient transport and cell infiltration. This porous structure maintains ease of manufacture via conventional 3D printing while significantly improving tissue regeneration consistency by enabling uniform cell distribution and fibrocartilage formation throughout the implant, addressing the variability seen in dense synthetic polymer scaffolds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

4Adaptability or versatility

If scaffold is customized for specific defect geometry, then adaptability is improved, but manufacturing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomization to defect geometryVSAvoidmanufacturing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The 3D printing process uses periodic deposition of alternating circumferential and radial filament layers in a repeating pattern. This periodic manufacturing approach allows the system to efficiently build customized geometries by repeating the same alternating layer sequence, reducing manufacturing time compared to creating each unique layer individually while still achieving full customization of the overall scaffold shape and size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The alternating circumferential-radial filament pattern serves multiple functions simultaneously: it provides mechanical strength in both directions, creates the load-distributing architecture, and can be adapted to any defect geometry through digital modeling. This universal manufacturing approach allows the same printing process and filament pattern to produce customized scaffolds for various meniscal defect shapes and sizes, reducing manufacturing time while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The scaffold provides personalized mechanical support for meniscus regeneration, promoting fibrocartilage formation and preventing osteoarthritis by mimicking native meniscus properties, while allowing customization to fit unique defect geometries.

Implementation Method 1

fabricated using 3D printing

Methodology Applied
Scientific Effect3D Printing: 3D Printing

Data Source

PatentUS20250375299A1Polymer filament reinforced scaffold for partial meniscus regeneration
Publication Date: 2025.12.11 RUTGERS THE STATE UNIV
  • US20250375299A1 patent drawing
  • US20250375299A1 patent drawing
  • US20250375299A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for fabricating a resorbable scaffold for regeneration of meniscal tissue is disclosed. The method includes fabricating a polymer filament network using 3D printing in accordance with a digital model of the polymer filament network, such that the polymer filament network will include a first plurality of layers comprising the circumferentially-oriented filaments alternating with a second plurality of layers comprising the radially-oriented filaments, the polymer filament network having a three-dimensional shape and geometry between a first layer and a second layer which is substantially the same as a three-dimensional shape and geometry of the resorbable scaffold.