Merchant Transaction System for Real-Time Fraud Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems lack the capability to effectively and efficiently identify compromised accounts and breaches in financial transactions, particularly due to the complexity of fraudulent activities involving multiple entities and the difficulty in tracing common points-of-purchase, leading to extensive losses for financial institutions.

Innovation Solution

A merchant transaction system that utilizes a processor and memory to receive transaction requests, transmit risk assessment messages, and calculate merchant and account risk scores based on transaction data from multiple financial institutions, identifying potential breaches through spikes in fraudulent activity and MERC values.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional back-tracing methods are used to identify common points-of-purchase, then fraudulent transactions can be detected, but the process is too slow and inaccurate to identify breaches in real-time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of breach identificationVSAvoidtime to identify breaches
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary risk assessment by continuously monitoring and analyzing transaction patterns before breaches are fully executed. By establishing baseline behavior and detecting anomalies in advance, the system identifies potential breaches earlier than traditional back-tracing methods, reducing both the time loss and improving detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where transaction data from multiple financial institutions is constantly analyzed, and risk scores are updated in real-time. This feedback mechanism allows the system to adapt to new fraud patterns immediately, improving detection accuracy and reducing the time required to identify breaches compared to static traditional methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive transaction data from multiple institutions is analyzed, then breach detection accuracy improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebreach detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates a universal risk assessment platform that handles multiple data sources, transaction types, and analysis methods through a single integrated architecture. This multi-functional system consolidates what would otherwise require separate complex systems for each institution, achieving high detection accuracy while managing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms complex multi-institutional transaction data into simplified risk scores by changing the parameters from raw transaction details to aggregated risk metrics. This parameter transformation maintains detection accuracy while reducing the complexity of data processing and analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If real-time risk assessment is implemented for card-not-present transactions, then fraudulent transactions are blocked, but legitimate transactions may be delayed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud prevention effectivenessVSAvoidtransaction processing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial risk assessment by focusing analysis only on transactions that exhibit suspicious characteristics. Rather than thoroughly analyzing every transaction, the system performs lightweight screening on all transactions and detailed analysis only on flagged cases, maintaining both fraud prevention effectiveness and transaction processing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements preliminary anti-action by pre-establishing risk thresholds and automated decision rules that allow most legitimate transactions to proceed without human review. Only transactions that exceed predetermined risk levels trigger additional verification, preventing fraud while minimizing delays to legitimate transactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentUS11030622B2Card systems and methods
Publication Date: 2021.06.08 EARLY WARNING SERVICES LLC
  • US11030622B2 patent drawing
  • US11030622B2 patent drawing
  • US11030622B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for identifying potentially illicit purchases, especially in card-not-present transactions. In one implementation, a merchant transaction system comprises a processor and memory. The system receives a transaction request from a customer for a card-not-present sale transaction. The system transmits over an electronic network a transaction risk request message to a transaction risk evaluator, and receives over the electronic network a reply message from the transaction risk evaluator, indicating a level of risk associated with the sale transaction. The system can decide whether to proceed with the card-not-present sale transaction based at least in part on the content of the reply message.