Mercury Stabilization via Oxidation and Sulfidation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for treating mercury-polluted waste, particularly in the chlorine industry, are inefficient and costly, lacking a reliable process for immobilizing all mercurial forms in a short time frame while being economically viable.

Innovation Solution

A process involving oxidation of mercurial species in an aqueous alkaline medium followed by sulphurization to convert mercuric oxides into stable and insoluble mercuric sulfides, using reagents like peroxomonosulphate and alkali metal sulphides, effectively stabilizing the waste.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of substance

If thermal desorption processes are used to eliminate and recover mercury from solids, then mercury recovery is achieved, but the process is complex and energy-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemercury recoveryVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the chemical parameters of mercury by converting it from elemental or soluble forms to insoluble mercuric sulfide through controlled chemical reactions. This transformation allows mercury to be immobilized in the solid waste matrix without requiring thermal desorption, thereby simplifying the process while achieving effective mercury recovery and prevention of loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention extracts mercury from its harmful soluble or elemental forms through chemical conversion to insoluble mercuric sulfide. By removing the mobile and toxic forms of mercury and transforming them into a stable, insoluble compound, the process achieves mercury recovery without the complexity of thermal desorption systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If encapsulation in impermeable membranes is used to immobilize mercury, then mercury leaching is prevented, but the process is costly and complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemercury leachingVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the solubility parameter of mercury by converting it to insoluble mercuric sulfide through chemical reaction with sulfide ions. This intrinsic chemical transformation eliminates the need for physical encapsulation barriers, preventing mercury leaching through molecular-level stabilization rather than macroscopic containment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces the mechanical approach of encapsulation in impermeable membranes with a chemical approach of transforming mercury into an insoluble compound. This substitution eliminates the need for complex encapsulation systems while achieving equivalent or superior prevention of mercury leaching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Stability of the object's composition

If cement or fly ash is added to stabilize mercury-polluted waste, then mercury immobilization is achieved, but the process is slow and less effective

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemercury stabilityVSAvoidtreatment speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses strong oxidizing agents such as peroxomonosulfate, peroxodisulfate, or permanganate to rapidly oxidize elemental mercury and other mercurial species to mercuric ions. This accelerated oxidation, combined with subsequent sulfidation, achieves complete mercury stabilization much faster than biological or slow chemical processes using cement or fly ash.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #38Strong oxidants (Accelerated oxidation)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention performs preliminary oxidation of mercury to mercuric ions before sulfidation. This preliminary action ensures that all forms of mercury are converted to a reactive state that can be rapidly precipitated as insoluble mercuric sulfide, achieving complete stabilization in a short time frame rather than relying on slow progressive immobilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Stability of the object's composition

If sulfur and sulfide are added to form amalgam, then mercury fixation is achieved, but the process requires high activation energy and is unsatisfactory

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemercury fixationVSAvoidactivation energy
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses strong oxidizing agents to convert elemental mercury to mercuric ions, which then react readily with sulfide ions to form insoluble mercuric sulfide. This two-step process bypasses the high activation energy barrier of direct amalgam formation by sulfur, as the oxidized mercuric species react much more readily with sulfide to achieve complete fixation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #38Strong oxidants (Accelerated oxidation)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces oxidation as an intermediary step between elemental mercury and sulfide. Rather than attempting direct reaction between sulfur/sulfide and elemental mercury (which requires high activation energy), the oxidation step converts mercury to a more reactive ionic form that readily combines with sulfide, thereby mediating the reaction to proceed under milder conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

5Reliability

If multiple treatment steps are used to address different mercurial forms, then comprehensive treatment is achieved, but the process is time-consuming and costly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment effectivenessVSAvoidtreatment time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The invention employs a universal two-step treatment protocol using peroxomonosulfate/peroxodisulfate/permanganate as oxidants followed by sulfide addition that effectively treats all forms of mercurial species (elemental mercury, soluble salts, particulate mercury, and organic mercury compounds). This multi-functional approach eliminates the need for separate treatment processes for different mercury forms, achieving comprehensive treatment in a single integrated process that is both rapid and cost-effective.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method significantly reduces mercury vapor emissions and leachability, enhancing safety and storage compliance by converting elemental mercury and other metals into stable forms, achieving high stability and reducing toxicity in treated waste.

Implementation Method 1

The oxidation step is carried out in the presence of at least one oxidation reagent chosen from peroxomonosulphate, peroxodisulphate, dichromate, permanganate and perchlorate of an alkali metal such as sodium or potassium

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 2

the sulphurization step is carried out in an aqueous medium in the presence of at least one alkali metal sulphide, a mixture of alkali metal sulphides or similar compounds... transforms the oxides previously obtained in metal sulphides, insoluble and stable

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPrecipitation: Precipitation

Data Source

PatentEP1849503B8Method of treating solid waste polluted with mercury
Publication Date: 2013.10.02 TREDI

AI summary

The present invention relates to a process for treating polluted solid waste, particularly with mercury, comprising at least one oxidation step of the metallic species and one sulfuration step in an alkaline medium of the oxidized metallic species.