Merging Partial Numerical Simulations for Aircraft Impact Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current computer numerical analysis methods for impact safety testing in aircraft seating are time-consuming and costly, limiting the scope and variation of simulations due to high data processing demands.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the generation of combined computer numerical simulations by merging partial numerical simulations of aircraft seat components and virtual passengers or test dummies, allowing for simulation of collisions without the need to reprocess extensive data, thereby reducing computational requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If extensive virtual testing is performed using computer numerical simulation, then passenger safety certification is improved, but data processing costs and time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepassenger safety certificationVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides a complete impact simulation into multiple sequential partial simulations. Each partial simulation models a specific time interval of the impact event separately. By segmenting the simulation, the computational workload is distributed across multiple smaller, manageable simulations that can be processed more efficiently than a single comprehensive simulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary partial simulations to generate simulation data for specific time intervals before the complete analysis is needed. These preliminary simulations prepare intermediate results that can be reused and combined later, avoiding the need to reprocess entire impact scenarios when analyzing different aspects or variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If extensive virtual testing is performed using computer numerical simulation, then passenger safety certification is improved, but processing costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepassenger safety certificationVSAvoiddata processing costs
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the simulation into partial simulations that can be executed independently and combined. This segmentation allows computational resources to be used more efficiently by processing smaller time intervals separately, reducing the overall computational burden and associated costs while maintaining the rigor needed for safety certification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent discards the need to reprocess entire impact simulations when analyzing different scenarios. Instead, it recovers and reuses simulation data from partial simulations that have already been computed, significantly reducing redundant computational work and associated processing costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Measurement precision

If full-scale simulations are run from initial conditions to impact, then complete impact analysis is achieved, but computational requirements and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact analysis completenessVSAvoidsimulation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the impact analysis into multiple partial simulations covering different time intervals. Each partial simulation maintains measurement precision for its specific interval while avoiding the computational overhead of running complete full-scale simulations for every analysis need. The segmented approach preserves impact analysis completeness through proper combination of partial results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by performing simulations only for the specific time intervals and conditions needed rather than running complete simulations from initial conditions to final impact for all possible scenarios. This partial simulation approach maintains necessary measurement precision while significantly improving simulation efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20220253569A1Recombination of numerical analysis for impact simulation
Publication Date: 2022.08.11 ZODIAC SEATS US LLC
  • US20220253569A1 patent drawing
  • US20220253569A1 patent drawing
  • US20220253569A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Computational numerical analysis for passenger seating assemblies can be performed by generating a combined computer numerical simulation based on two or more partial numerical simulations of different assemblies and/or virtual passengers or anthropomorphic test dummies (ATDs). The partial numerical simulations may be run for a common, nonzero period of time, after which first simulation data from the first numerical simulation and second simulation data from the second numerical simulation can be captured and used for generating the combined numerical simulation. The combined numerical simulation can simulate a collision between the different assemblies and/or virtual ATDs by assembling the first and second partial simulation data such that the modeled assemblies collide in the combined computer numerical simulation. Any suitable number of combined numerical simulations in a variety of specific variations may be regenerated using the first and second partial simulation data.