Manufacturing Parameter Verification via MES and Equipment Interface

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current manual methods for managing manufacturing process parameters in manufacturing equipment are time-consuming, labor-intensive, prone to errors, and lack systematic data management, leading to poor timeliness, high error rates, and delayed response to quality issues.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for automatically acquiring and verifying manufacturing process parameter information against registered reference ranges, providing real-time feedback, and integrating with equipment interface and manufacturing execution servers to ensure timely corrections and data management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual inspection method is used to manage manufacturing process parameters, then labor flexibility is maintained, but timeliness of parameter verification deteriorates and error rate increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of parameter verificationVSAvoidtimeliness of parameter inspection
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical inspection system with an automated electronic verification system. The manufacturing execution server automatically retrieves process parameters from equipment, compares them against reference ranges, and generates verification results without human intervention. This substitution eliminates manual errors and significantly improves both accuracy and timeliness of parameter verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service verification where the manufacturing execution server autonomously performs parameter retrieval, comparison, and verification without requiring operator intervention. The equipment interface server and manufacturing equipment work together to automatically provide and verify parameters, making the system self-sufficient and eliminating delays associated with manual inspection schedules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If manual inspection method is used, then system complexity is reduced, but productivity of parameter verification deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification speed of manufacturing parametersVSAvoidcomplexity of verification system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The manufacturing execution server performs multiple functions: retrieving process parameters from equipment, comparing parameters against reference ranges, generating verification results, and managing the entire verification workflow. This multi-functionality consolidates what would otherwise require separate systems into a single platform, improving verification speed while keeping overall system complexity manageable through functional integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The equipment interface server acts as an intermediary between the manufacturing equipment and the manufacturing execution server. It handles the complexity of equipment-specific communication protocols and data formats, translating them into standardized interfaces that the verification server can process. This intermediary layer shields the core verification logic from equipment complexity while enabling high-speed automated verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Loss of information

If manual inspection is performed, then data collection is simple, but systematic management of manufacturing data deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of parameter dataVSAvoidcomplexity of data management system
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary data collection and organization before verification is needed. The manufacturing execution server continuously retrieves and stores process parameters in a structured format with timestamps and source identification. This preliminary organization of data ensures complete information availability for verification while maintaining systematic management through pre-established data structures and storage protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where verification results are fed back to the manufacturing execution server, which then notifies relevant personnel or systems of any deviations. This feedback mechanism ensures that complete parameter information is maintained and systematically managed, with automatic alerts ensuring that no verification results are lost or overlooked, while the digital feedback trail maintains data integrity without requiring complex manual tracking systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11402827B2Method for controlling a manufacturing process parameter and electronic device
Publication Date: 2022.08.02 HEFEI XINSHENG OPTOELECTRONICS TECH CO LTD
  • US11402827B2 patent drawing
  • US11402827B2 patent drawing
  • US11402827B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides a method for controlling a manufacturing process parameter, a manufacturing execution server, and an equipment interface server. The method includes: acquiring manufacturing process parameter information of an manufacturing equipment; and verifying the acquired manufacturing process parameter information according to reference ranges of manufacturing process parameter information of multiple manufacturing equipments which are registered in advance, and feeding back a verification result.