Wireless Mesh Node Interference Characterization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wireless mesh networks face significant interference issues due to 'hidden node' conditions, where nodes cannot receive each other's transmissions, leading to self-interference and poor link quality, particularly in densely populated networks.

Innovation Solution

Implement a method where wireless access nodes collect and compare air-time usage histories to identify and mitigate uncoordinated interference by synchronizing transmission timing with neighboring nodes, adjusting transmission bit rates, power, and fragmenting data packets to avoid interference.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If wireless mesh networks include many wireless nodes in relatively close proximity, then network coverage and connectivity are improved, but self-interference and hidden node conditions increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork coverage areaVSAvoidself-interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary characterization of interference patterns by collecting and analyzing air-time usage histories before transmissions occur. This allows nodes to identify hidden node conditions and potential interference sources in advance, enabling proactive mitigation strategies such as adjusting transmission timing or power levels to prevent collisions rather than reacting to them after they occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where wireless nodes monitor air-time usage, characterize interference patterns, and adjust their transmission behavior based on observed conditions. The interference characterization information feeds back into transmission decisions, allowing dynamic adaptation to changing network conditions and interference patterns, thereby maintaining efficient operation despite high node density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If wireless nodes transmit data packets simultaneously without coordination, then data transmission speed is improved, but uncoordinated interference and collisions increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transmission speedVSAvoidtransmission reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary characterization of air-time usage patterns and interference conditions before data transmissions occur. By analyzing historical air-time data and identifying patterns of uncoordinated interference, nodes can pre-coordinate their transmissions to avoid collisions while still maintaining high throughput. This preliminary analysis enables faster reliable transmissions compared to reactive collision avoidance methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts transmission parameters such as timing, power levels, and channel selection based on real-time interference characterization. Rather than using static transmission schedules, nodes adapt their behavior dynamically according to observed air-time usage patterns and interference conditions, allowing the network to maintain high productivity while avoiding collisions through flexible, condition-based coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If wireless access nodes collect and analyze air-time usage history from multiple neighbors, then interference characterization accuracy is improved, but communication overhead and processing complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference characterization accuracyVSAvoidanalysis complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the interference characterization process into manageable components: individual nodes collect their own air-time usage history, exchange limited information with direct neighbors, and perform localized analysis. Rather than one node collecting data from all network nodes, each node performs segmented analysis on its own and immediate neighbor data, reducing individual processing complexity while maintaining overall accuracy through distributed measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The air-time usage history acts as an intermediary data structure that simplifies the characterization process. Instead of directly analyzing complex interference patterns between multiple nodes, the system uses pre-collected air-time usage histories as intermediate representations that capture essential timing and usage information. This intermediary representation reduces the complexity of direct interference analysis while preserving the information needed for accurate characterization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS8559407B2Characterizing uncoordinated interference of a wireless network
Publication Date: 2013.10.15 HITACHI ENERGY LTD
  • US8559407B2 patent drawing
  • US8559407B2 patent drawing
  • US8559407B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus and method of a wireless access node within a network characterizing uncoordinated interference is disclosed. One method includes the wireless node collecting air-time usage history as perceived by the wireless access node. The wireless access node receives air-time usage history as perceived by at least one neighboring wireless node. The wireless access node comparatively analyzes the collected air-time usage and the received air-time usage.