Triangulated Mesh Boundary Mapping for Variable-Topology Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing model-based image segmentation techniques using triangulated surface meshes are limited to fixed topologies, preventing effective segmentation of anatomical structures with significant shape variations or abnormalities.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a feature mapping network that assigns a feature selection vector to each triangle of a triangulated mesh of arbitrary topology, allowing boundary detection using a boundary detection network trained on meshes of known topology, enabling segmentation of structures with varying shapes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional machine learning approaches (support vector machines, random forests) are used for image segmentation, then implementation simplicity is maintained, but segmentation accuracy deteriorates due to inability to capture contextual information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesegmentation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The image is divided into multiple patches that are processed independently by CNNs, with each patch generating segmentation labels. These patch-level results are then aggregated to form the final segmentation map, enabling accurate contextual analysis while managing computational complexity through divide-and-conquer

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A CRF (Conditional Random Field) layer is introduced as an intermediary between the CNN feature extraction stage and the final segmentation output. This CRF layer models spatial relationships and contextual dependencies between adjacent pixels, refining the raw CNN predictions to achieve more accurate segmentation boundaries

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If deep learning models with contextual analysis are implemented, then segmentation accuracy is improved, but computational resource requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesegmentation accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The image is divided into multiple patches that are processed independently by CNNs, with each patch generating segmentation labels. These patch-level results are then aggregated to form the final segmentation map, enabling accurate contextual analysis while managing computational complexity through divide-and-conquer

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of processing the entire image at once with a full deep learning model, the system applies CNNs to selected patches and uses a lighter CRF refinement step, performing partial processing that achieves good accuracy with reduced computational overhead compared to exhaustive full-image deep learning

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If deep learning models are used for image segmentation, then segmentation accuracy is improved, but processing speed deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesegmentation accuracyVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The image is divided into multiple patches that are processed independently by CNNs, with each patch generating segmentation labels. These patch-level results are then aggregated to form the final segmentation map, enabling accurate contextual analysis while managing computational complexity through divide-and-conquer

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The segmentation process is performed in periodic stages: first extracting features from multiple patches using CNNs, then applying CRF refinement to adjust boundaries, and finally aggregating results. This staged periodic approach balances accuracy requirements with processing efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentEP4104142B1Model-based image segmentation
Publication Date: 2026.05.20 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • EP4104142B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4104142B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4104142B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method and system for mapping boundary detecting features of at least one source triangulated mesh of known topology to a target triangulated mesh of arbitrary topology. A region of interest in a volumetric image associated with each triangle of the target triangulated mesh is provided to a feature mapping network. The feature mapping network assigns a feature selection vector to each triangle of the target triangulated mesh. The associated region of interest and assigned feature selection vector for each triangle of the target triangulated mesh are provided to a boundary detection network. A predicted boundary based on features of the associated region of interest selected by the assigned feature selection vector is obtained from the boundary detection network.