Carbon-Coated Mesh Electrodes for Hybrid Flow Battery Plating

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current hybrid flow battery systems face limitations in efficiency and cost due to the use of expensive titanium-based electrodes and carbon-based porous materials, which lead to side reactions, reduced battery capacity, and increased manufacturing costs, particularly in all-iron redox flow batteries where hydrogen proton reduction and corrosion reduce overall efficiency and capacity.

Innovation Solution

A novel redox flow battery system is developed using a carbon-coated plastic mesh electrode with a membrane interposed between electrodes, featuring a spacer with main ribs and flow field plates to increase electrode gap, accommodate higher current densities, and reduce gas bubble entrapment, thereby enhancing plating kinetics and reducing manufacturing and operating costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If titanium-based electrodes are used, then electrode stability is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrode stabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive titanium-based electrodes with inexpensive plastic mesh electrodes. Although plastic mesh has lower inherent stability, it is coated with conductive materials and catalytic layers to achieve the required performance, dramatically reducing manufacturing costs while maintaining functional stability through the composite structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates composite electrode structures by coating plastic mesh with conductive materials (such as carbon, conductive polymers) and catalytic layers. This composite approach combines the low cost and chemical inertness of plastic mesh with the electrical conductivity and stability of coating materials, resolving the contradiction between cost and performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If carbon-based porous materials are used, then electrode conductivity is improved, but side reactions increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrode conductivityVSAvoidside reactions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces carbon-based porous materials with plastic mesh electrodes. Plastic mesh does not exhibit the same side reactions as carbon materials (such as hydrogen evolution), eliminating harmful effects while maintaining conductivity through conductive coatings and catalytic layers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent addresses the issue of side reactions by using plastic mesh as a base material that inherently avoids carbon-related side reactions. The structure is then enhanced with functional coatings to provide the necessary conductivity and catalytic activity, converting the limitation of plastic (lower inherent conductivity) into an advantage by eliminating harmful side reactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Productivity

If electrode gap is increased, then plating kinetics are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplating kineticsVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces spacers with main ribs that segment the electrode assembly into defined regions. These spacers maintain a controlled electrode gap, enabling improved plating kinetics while organizing the device structure in a systematic way that does not significantly increase complexity. The segmentation approach allows for modular assembly and standardized components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Quantity of substance

If current density is increased, then battery capacity is improved, but gas bubble entrapment increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery capacityVSAvoidgas bubble entrapment
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses spacers with main ribs to segment the electrode structure, creating channels and pathways that facilitate gas bubble escape. This segmentation allows higher current densities and improved battery capacity while preventing gas bubble entrapment through the structured flow paths created by the ribbed spacer design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The spacers act as intermediary structures between the electrodes, providing a physical framework that manages gas bubble transport. The main ribs create defined spaces that allow electrolyte flow and gas bubble movement, mediating between the high current density requirements and the need to prevent gas entrapment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The carbon-coated plastic mesh electrode system improves plating kinetics, reduces current density distribution variance, and increases battery charging capacity while lowering costs, accommodating higher electrolyte flow and gas bubble evolution rates, thus addressing the inefficiencies and cost issues of existing systems.

Implementation Method 1

a membrane interposed between a first electrode positioned at a first side of the membrane and a second electrode positioned at a second side of the membrane opposite to the first side

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIon transport: Ion Exchange

Implementation Method 2

The stored chemical energy is converted to an electrical form via spontaneous reverse redox reactions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrochemical reactions: Redox Reactions

Implementation Method 3

a carbon-coated plastic mesh electrode with a membrane interposed between electrodes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConduction: Conduction (electrical)

Implementation Method 4

accommodate higher current densities, and reduce gas bubble entrapment, thereby enhancing plating kinetics

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas bubble evolution: Bubble

Implementation Method 5

flow field plates to increase electrode gap, accommodate higher current densities

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrolyte flow: Convection

Data Source

PatentUS11855312B2Alternative low cost electrodes for hybrid flow batteries
Publication Date: 2023.12.26 ESS TECH INC
  • US11855312B2 patent drawing
  • US11855312B2 patent drawing
  • US11855312B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A redox flow battery may include: a membrane interposed between a first electrode positioned at a first side of the membrane and a second electrode positioned at a second side of the membrane opposite to the first side; a first flow field plate comprising a plurality of positive flow field ribs, each of the plurality of positive flow field ribs contacting the first electrode at first supporting regions on the first side; and the second electrode, including an electrode spacer positioned between the membrane and a second flow field plate, the electrode spacer comprising a plurality of main ribs, each of the plurality of main ribs contacting the second flow field plate at second supporting regions on the second side, each of the second supporting regions aligned opposite to one of the plurality of first supporting regions. As such, a current density distribution at a plating surface may be reduced.