Mesh-Reinforced Aircraft Fuselage Structure for Lower Weight

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional aircraft fuselage structures are structurally resistant but heavy and costly to produce, necessitating a lighter and more economical alternative.

Innovation Solution

A fuselage structure featuring a lattice-reinforced skin with frames and spars arranged along the longitudinal direction, where spars extend through slots in the frames and are fixed to the skin, and torque boxes provide additional reinforcement, eliminating traditional stiffeners to reduce weight while maintaining structural integrity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If traditional stiffeners and numerous frames are used, then structural resistance is improved, but weight increases and production cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural resistanceVSAvoidfuselage weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes traditional stiffeners from the fuselage structure, retaining only essential frames and longerons. This extraction of non-essential components reduces weight while maintaining structural resistance through the optimized frame-skin- longeron configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The fuselage is divided into modular sections with frames spaced at optimized intervals, rather than using continuous or densely spaced traditional framing. This segmentation allows weight reduction while preserving structural integrity at critical locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Strength

If traditional stiffeners and numerous frames are used, then structural resistance is improved, but production cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural resistanceVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By eliminating stiffeners and reducing the number of frames, the patent simplifies the manufacturing process, reduces material procurement costs, and lowers assembly complexity, thereby decreasing overall production cost while maintaining adequate structural resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines the functions of frames and longerons into a simplified configuration where frames serve both structural and positioning functions, reducing the total number of components and simplifying manufacturing and assembly operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Strength

If frames are spaced closer together, then structural resistance is improved, but weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural resistanceVSAvoidfuselage weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes frame spacing by distributing frames at critical locations rather than uniformly close spacing, achieving adequate structural resistance only where needed while reducing weight in less critical areas through increased spacing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The frame spacing and configuration are tailored to local structural requirements, with closer spacing or reinforced frames at high-stress areas and wider spacing at low-stress areas, optimizing the weight-strength balance across different fuselage sections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP3670325B1Structure of a fuselage of an aircraft with a mesh-reinforced panel
Publication Date: 2021.10.13 AIRBUS OPERATIONS (SAS)
  • EP3670325B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3670325B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3670325B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

The invention relates to a structure (156) of an aircraft fuselage (150), said structure (156) comprising a skin (158) having an outer face (160) and an inner face (162) machined in the form of a lattice-reinforced panel, a plurality of frames (164), each frame (164) taking the shape of the fuselage section (150), and the frames (164) being arranged one after the other along a longitudinal direction X of the fuselage (150), wherein the outer perimeter of each frame (164) is fixed to the inner face (162), a plurality of longerons (166a-e) extending parallel to the longitudinal direction X of the fuselage (150), wherein each longeron (166a-e) extends through several frames (164) by passing through them at an opening (168) provided for this purpose in each frame (164) and where each longeron (166a-e) is applied against the inner face (162) and fixed thereto, and, in the upper and lower parts of the fuselage (150),a torsion box (302) extending parallel to the longitudinal direction X of the fuselage (150), where each torsion box comprises a horizontal plate and tabs that fix the plate to the inner face (162). The particular combination of this structure is lightweight while being particularly strong and economical.