Dynamic Scheduling in Wireless Mesh Networks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wireless communication networks face challenges in maintaining interference reduction and throughput enhancement due to channel variations and interference power fluctuations, especially as mobile device capabilities expand beyond older network systems.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a dynamic scheduling method that selects between sender-based and receiver-based scheduling protocols based on node topology, traffic ratios, and interference levels, allowing nodes to determine the most efficient scheduling technique for data packet transmission by evaluating the amount of downloading versus uploading activity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a single scheduling protocol (sender-based or receiver-based) is used in a wireless mesh network, then the system structure is simple and easy to implement, but the network throughput is limited and cannot adapt to varying channel conditions and traffic patterns

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork throughputVSAvoidscheduling system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic scheduling by allowing mesh nodes to switch between sender-based and receiver-based scheduling protocols based on real-time channel conditions, traffic patterns, and node roles. This dynamic adaptation enables the network to optimize throughput for varying conditions without requiring a completely complex new scheduling system, as each node independently selects the appropriate protocol mode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the scheduling parameter from a fixed protocol selection to a dynamic one based on channel state information, traffic load, and node characteristics. By adjusting the scheduling approach parameter according to measured network conditions, the system achieves higher throughput while maintaining implementation feasibility through standardized protocol modifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If traditional scheduling protocols are used in older wireless network systems, then the system is stable and easy to maintain, but it cannot facilitate fully exploiting new and improved wireless device capabilities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice capability compatibilityVSAvoidnetwork stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables wireless mesh networks to dynamically adapt to new device capabilities by allowing nodes to switch between sender-based and receiver-based scheduling protocols. This dynamic flexibility allows the network to exploit advanced features of modern devices (such as multiple antennas, higher processing power, and improved modulation schemes) while maintaining stability through proven scheduling mechanisms, thus bridging the gap between old network infrastructure and new device capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If sender-based scheduling is used, then the sending node has control over transmission timing and resource allocation, but the system performs poorly when downloading activity significantly exceeds uploading activity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission efficiencyVSAvoidtraffic pattern adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic protocol selection where mesh nodes monitor traffic patterns and automatically switch between sender-based and receiver-based scheduling. When downloading activity significantly exceeds uploading activity, the system transitions to receiver-based scheduling, which allows the receiving node (typically the access point in download scenarios) to control resource allocation and transmission timing, thereby optimizing transmission efficiency for download-heavy traffic patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the control parameter from fixed sender-based allocation to dynamic allocation based on traffic direction. By monitoring the ratio of downloading to uploading activity and adjusting the scheduling control parameter accordingly, the system achieves high transmission efficiency for both upload-dominated and download-dominated traffic patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If receiver-based scheduling is used, then the receiving node can optimize resource allocation for download traffic, but the system performs poorly when uploading activity significantly exceeds downloading activity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation efficiencyVSAvoidtraffic pattern adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic protocol selection where mesh nodes monitor traffic patterns and automatically switch between receiver-based and sender-based scheduling. When uploading activity significantly exceeds downloading activity, the system transitions to sender-based scheduling, which allows the sending node (typically the mobile device in upload scenarios) to control resource allocation and transmission timing, thereby optimizing transmission efficiency for upload-heavy traffic patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

5Ease of operation

If fixed channel assignment is used in wireless communication networks, then the system is simple to manage and maintain, but interference power variations and channel variations degrade communication quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel management simplicityVSAvoidcommunication quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic scheduling that allows mesh nodes to adapt transmission parameters based on real-time channel conditions and interference levels. By dynamically selecting between sender-based and receiver-based scheduling protocols and adjusting resource allocation accordingly, the system maintains simple channel management while improving communication quality through adaptive response to channel variations and interference power fluctuations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8036135B2Mac performance of a mesh network using both sender-based and receiver-based scheduling
Publication Date: 2011.10.11 QUALCOMM INC
  • US8036135B2 patent drawing
  • US8036135B2 patent drawing
  • US8036135B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methodologies are described that facilitate determining when and whether to implement a sender-based data packet scheduling mechanism or a receiver-based data packet scheduling mechanism based on one or mode scheduling factors. For example, a sending node and a receiving node may communicate to permit a determination of which node is more capable of performing the scheduling tasks, and a corresponding scheduling technique may be selected and executed. According to an aspect, an amount of data downloading may be compared to an amount of data uploading at each node, and a sender-based scheduling protocol may be performed when the amount of data uploading is greater than the amount of downloading data.