Wireless Mesh Network Transmission Power Regulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wireless mesh networks experience interference due to simultaneous transmission from multiple devices, particularly from substantially periodic data traffic which causes continuous interference with unintended receivers.

Innovation Solution

Regulating transmission signal power by identifying data traffic types as either bursty or substantially periodic, and adjusting power levels accordingly, with lower power settings for substantially periodic traffic to minimize interference.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If transmission power is increased to maintain network coverage and capacity, then network productivity is improved, but interference to unintended receivers increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork capacityVSAvoidinterference
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating transmission power levels based on traffic type. Substantially periodic traffic (like routing beacons) transmits at reduced power levels, while bursty traffic maintains higher power levels. This localized adjustment of power quality for specific traffic types reduces interference without compromising overall network capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the power parameter dynamically based on traffic characteristics. By identifying whether traffic is substantially periodic or bursty, the system adjusts transmission power accordingly - reducing power for periodic traffic to minimize interference while maintaining adequate power for bursty traffic to ensure network capacity and coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-generated harmful factors

If transmission power is reduced to minimize interference, then harmful factors are reduced, but signal-to-noise ratio deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveinterferenceVSAvoidsignal-to-noise ratio
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by selectively reducing power only for substantially periodic traffic types that cause continuous interference, while maintaining higher power levels for bursty traffic. This targeted approach ensures that signal-to-noise ratio is preserved for traffic types that require it, while interference is reduced for periodic traffic patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic power adjustment based on real-time traffic classification. The system continuously monitors traffic patterns and adapts power levels accordingly - reducing power when periodic traffic is detected and maintaining higher power when bursty traffic requires it for reliable communication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If uniform high power is used for all traffic types, then reliability is maintained, but interference increases continuously

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoidcontinuous interference
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating between traffic types and assigning appropriate power levels. Substantially periodic traffic (such as routing beacons) transmits at reduced power to minimize continuous interference, while bursty traffic maintains higher power to ensure reliable communication during active data transfers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the power parameter based on traffic characteristics identified through classification. By detecting whether traffic is substantially periodic or bursty, the system dynamically adjusts power levels to optimize both reliability and interference reduction for each traffic type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Object-generated harmful factors

If transmission power is adjusted dynamically based on traffic type, then interference is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveinterferenceVSAvoidpower regulation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes power parameters based on traffic type classification. The access point identifies whether incoming traffic is substantially periodic or bursty and automatically adjusts transmission power accordingly, reducing interference without requiring complex manual configuration or intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements self-service through automatic traffic classification and power adjustment. The system monitors its own traffic patterns, identifies periodic versus bursty traffic types, and autonomously regulates power levels without external control, simplifying operation despite the dynamic nature of the adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS7720499B2Regulation of transmission power within a wireless network
Publication Date: 2010.05.18 HITACHI ENERGY LTD
  • US7720499B2 patent drawing
  • US7720499B2 patent drawing
  • US7720499B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of optimizing link transmission parameters between access nodes within a mesh network is disclosed. The method includes each access node within the mesh transmitting packets at N different combinations of data rates and power levels. Each receiving node that receives the data packets at one or more of the N combinations, selects a most desirable one of the received combinations. The receiving nodes indicate to the transmitting nodes the selected most desired combination for transmitting to the receiving node.