Mesh Network Path Selection Using Dynamic Selective Scores

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional mesh network systems face inefficiencies due to exponential airtime penalties, high path adaptation latency, and insufficient consideration of network and device metrics for optimal path selection, particularly in complex wireless networks with multiple hops.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for selecting a communication network path by transmitting beacons with informative parameters, calculating dynamic selective scores based on network, device, and application metrics, and identifying the target path with the highest score, which reduces airtime penalties and latency while considering multi-backhaul aspects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional mesh network path selection is used, then network connectivity is established, but airtime penalty increases exponentially with the number of nodes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork connectivityVSAvoidairtime penalty
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary path scoring and selection by calculating selective scores for multiple candidate paths before actual data transmission. Nodes pre-evaluate paths using beacons containing informative parameters and device metrics, identifying optimal paths in advance to avoid exponential airtime penalties during runtime path selection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The path selection mechanism dynamically adapts to changing network conditions by continuously updating selective scores based on current device metrics, network metrics, and application metrics. Nodes can switch between multiple candidate paths depending on real-time conditions, making the system flexible and responsive rather than static

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If conventional path selection algorithms are used, then paths are established, but path adaptation latency is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepath establishmentVSAvoidpath adaptation latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple candidate paths are pre-calculated and scored using selective score mechanisms before they are needed for data transmission. This preliminary path preparation eliminates the need for time-consuming path discovery when adaptation is required, as nodes already have evaluated alternative paths ready for immediate switching

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors network conditions, device metrics, and application requirements, using this feedback to dynamically adjust selective scores and path selections. This feedback loop enables rapid path adaptation by comparing current conditions against pre-calculated path scores and selecting the optimal path without extensive re-evaluation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If simple path selection based on single metric is used, then selection process is simple, but network and device metrics are insufficiently considered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveselection process simplicityVSAvoidpath selection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The selective score mechanism combines multiple different metrics (device metrics, network metrics, application metrics) into a single composite scoring system for each candidate path. This composite approach maintains the simplicity of single-score comparison while incorporating comprehensive multi-dimensional evaluation of path quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the weights and parameters of different metrics based on current network conditions, device states, and application requirements. This allows the path selection to consider multiple factors with varying importance depending on the situation, achieving both simplicity in the selection process and precision in path evaluation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20230077941A1System and method for selecting a path in a communication network
Publication Date: 2023.03.16 QUBERCOMM TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US20230077941A1 patent drawing
  • US20230077941A1 patent drawing
  • US20230077941A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a method for selecting a path in a communication network. The method comprises transmitting, through a device connected to a target node, a beacon, to one or more nodes in the communication network. The beacon comprises a set of informative parameters. The method comprises calculating, by each node, a selective score towards one more paths to be selected for reaching the target node in the communication network. The method further comprises identifying, by each node, a target path from the one or more path. The target path is a path having a highest value of the selective score as compared to selective score for other paths in the one or more paths. The method further comprises selecting, by each node, the target path from the one or more paths for reaching the target node.