Two-Part Mesh Tack Delivery for Jam-Resistant Hernia Fixation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current mesh tacking devices for hernia repair are prone to jamming, require excessive use of absorbable tacks, and often deploy too many or too few tacks, leading to inefficiencies and material waste.

Innovation Solution

A two-part tack construction system where one part becomes a barb in the abdominal wall and the other secures the mesh, reducing the need for multiple tacks and minimizing jamming, using bio-absorbable materials like PLGA for secure fixation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional single-part tacks are used for mesh fixation, then the tacking process can be completed with conventional devices, but the devices are prone to jamming and require excessive use of absorbable tacks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetacking device reliabilityVSAvoidabsorbable tack material waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The tack is divided into two separate parts: a distal barb portion that penetrates the abdominal wall and a proximal abutment portion that remains outside. This segmentation allows each part to perform its specific function optimally - the barb provides secure anchoring in tissue while the abutment presses against the mesh, reducing the need for excessive tacks and minimizing material waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The delivery device acts as an intermediary that holds and positions both parts of the tack during insertion. The device includes a tip that receives the distal barb portion and a body that engages the proximal abutment portion, coordinating their simultaneous deployment to ensure reliable fixation without jamming.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Strength

If multiple tacks are deployed to ensure secure mesh fixation, then mesh security is improved, but the cost and material usage increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemesh fixation securityVSAvoidnumber of tacks required
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

By dividing the tack into functional segments (barb for tissue penetration, abutment for mesh contact), each component is optimized for its specific role. This allows fewer tacks to achieve the same or better fixation security compared to traditional single-part tacks, reducing the quantity of material required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The two-part construction changes the mechanical parameters of fixation by distributing forces differently - the barb provides anchoring strength while the abutment provides bearing surface contact with the mesh. This parameter change increases fixation efficiency, allowing secure attachment with fewer tacks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If conventional tacking devices are used, then the procedure can follow established protocols, but the devices often deploy too many or too few tacks leading to inefficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetacking procedure efficiencyVSAvoidtime for tack deployment
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The two parts of the tack are pre-assembled on the delivery device tip before insertion, with the distal barb portion received by the tip and the proximal abutment portion engaged by the device body. This preliminary configuration ensures that when the device is actuated, both parts are deployed simultaneously and precisely, eliminating the inefficiency of deploying too many or too few tacks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The delivery device is designed with mechanical feedback mechanisms that provide tactile or visual cues to the operator during deployment, ensuring proper positioning and activation of the two-part tack. This feedback ensures consistent and efficient deployment, optimizing productivity and reducing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250366967A1Fixation device delivery system
Publication Date: 2025.12.04 SHARP FLUIDICS INC
  • US20250366967A1 patent drawing
  • US20250366967A1 patent drawing
  • US20250366967A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A fixation device delivery system is described. The system includes a driver and a cooperating fixation element featuring a barb which becomes active upon deployment in the inner abdominal wall.