Mesitylene-Isopentane Avgas Formulations for High Octane and Vapor Pressure Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Aviation gasoline (Avgas) requires specific fuel properties such as high motor octane number, suitable vapor pressure, and insolubility in water to meet the diverse power demands and operating conditions of aircraft engines, which existing fuels struggle to consistently achieve, especially without the use of tetraethyl lead (TEL) due to its toxicity and regulatory phase-out.

Innovation Solution

Formulations combining mesitylene and isopentane, with optional inclusion of other components like isooctane, butane, and organometallic additives, to achieve a motor octane number of at least 100 and Reid vapor pressure within 38-49 kPa, ensuring effective engine performance and compliance with ASTM standards without TEL.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If tetraethyl lead (TEL) is used to increase motor octane number, then anti-knock quality improves, but toxicity increases and regulatory compliance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanti-knock qualityVSAvoidtoxicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes TEL from the fuel formulation entirely, extracting the harmful substance while maintaining the anti-knock function through alternative components like mesitylene and isopentane. This resolves the contradiction by eliminating the toxic element while preserving the desired performance characteristic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the chemical composition parameters by substituting TEL with a blend of aromatic hydrocarbons (mesitylene) and branched alkanes (isopentane, isooctane). This parameter change maintains the motor octane number above 100 while eliminating the toxicity associated with lead additives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If vapor pressure is increased to improve winter starting, then cold start performance improves, but vapor lock risk increases in summer heat

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewinter startingVSAvoidvapor lock
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adjusts the vapor pressure parameters through careful selection and ratio control of volatile components (isopentane, butane) and less volatile aromatic components (mesitylene). This creates a balanced formulation that provides sufficient vaporization for cold starts while limiting excessive vapor pressure that would cause vapor lock in hot conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a composite fuel formulation combining multiple hydrocarbon components with different volatility characteristics. The blend of mesitylene (lower volatility) with isopentane and butane (higher volatility) creates a composite material that balances cold start performance with vapor lock prevention across different temperature conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Power

If compression ratio is increased to improve engine efficiency, then power output improves, but engine knocking increases without sufficient octane rating

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine efficiencyVSAvoidengine knocking
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fuel's octane rating parameters by incorporating high-octane components (mesitylene with its aromatic structure and branched alkanes like isopentane and isooctane). This parameter change enables the fuel to withstand higher compression ratios without detonating, thereby allowing improved engine efficiency and power output without the harmful effect of knocking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of manufacture

If fuel formulation is simplified to reduce manufacturing complexity, then ease of manufacture improves, but ability to meet multiple performance requirements deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveformulation complexityVSAvoidperformance specification compliance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a composite fuel formulation consisting of four main hydrocarbon components in specific ratios. This composite approach allows the fuel to simultaneously meet multiple performance requirements (motor octane number >100, Reid vapor pressure 38-49 kPa, water insolubility) while maintaining a relatively simple formulation that is easier to manufacture than complex multi-component blends.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS11407951B2Aviation gasolines containing mesitylene and isopentane
Publication Date: 2022.08.09 SWIFT FUEL LLC
  • US11407951B2 patent drawing
  • US11407951B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Describe are preferred formulations for Avgas meeting the requirements for use in aircraft, including requirements established under ASTM standards and by the Federal Aviation Administration. In one embodiment, a binary mixture of 1,3,5-trimethyl benzene (mesitylene) and isopentane is used to provide a MON of at least 100, and more preferably at least 102. In other embodiments, the amounts of mesitylene and/or isopentane may be changed, and other fuel components are included. These various Avgas formulations are thereby adjusted to meet a variety of requirements as to octane rating, RVP, cold start, and other fuel characteristics.