Message Archiving System Using User Interaction Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional archiving technologies fail to efficiently and accurately identify and transfer unimportant electronic messages, often archiving important messages while leaving unimportant ones in the user's inbox, due to reliance on time-based or quota-based methods.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that monitor user interactions with messages, analyze message characteristics, and determine the importance of incoming messages based on user behavior, archiving unimportant messages while keeping important ones accessible.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If traditional archiving systems archive messages after a certain period or when inbox reaches quota, then storage space is freed, but important messages may be archived while unimportant messages remain in inbox

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of messages in inboxVSAvoidaccuracy of identifying unimportant messages
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system monitors user interactions with messages (opening, deleting, archiving, ignoring) and uses this feedback to learn and identify message characteristics that indicate unimportance. This continuous feedback loop enables the system to accurately distinguish important from unimportant messages, resolving the contradiction by improving identification accuracy while maintaining inbox organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically analyzes message characteristics and user behavior patterns to autonomously determine which messages are unimportant, without requiring manual user classification. This self-service capability enables accurate identification of unimportant messages for archiving, freeing storage space while preserving important messages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If archiving is performed immediately upon receipt based on basic filters, then processing time is reduced, but accuracy of identifying unimportant messages deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of message archivingVSAvoidaccuracy of importance determination
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of incoming messages by examining characteristics such as sender, subject, and content patterns, and compares these against learned user preferences to quickly determine unimportance. This preliminary action enables fast archiving decisions without sacrificing accuracy, as the system uses pre-established user behavior patterns to make rapid determinations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters used for archiving decisions from simple time-based or quota-based rules to multi-factor analysis including message characteristics, sender information, subject lines, and user interaction patterns. This parameter transformation enables both rapid processing and high accuracy in identifying unimportant messages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of information

If all incoming messages are displayed in inbox, then no messages are missed, but inbox becomes cluttered and difficult to navigate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of message deliveryVSAvoidease of identifying important messages
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts unimportant messages from the main inbox and moves them to archived storage, separating them from important messages that remain visible. This extraction process maintains complete message delivery (archived messages are still accessible) while dramatically improving inbox navigability by removing clutter from unimportant content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary archiving layer between message receipt and user viewing, where unimportant messages are automatically routed to archive rather than appearing in the main inbox. This intermediary mechanism preserves information completeness while enhancing operational ease by filtering out clutter before it reaches the user's primary view.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10063504B1Systems and methods for selectively archiving electronic messages
Publication Date: 2018.08.28 ARCTERA US LLC
  • US10063504B1 patent drawing
  • US10063504B1 patent drawing
  • US10063504B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosed computer-implemented method for selectively archiving electronic messages may include (1) monitoring, at a messaging account of a user, interactions between the user and messages received at the messaging account, (2) identifying message characteristics that are indicative of unimportant messages to the user by (A) identifying, based on the interactions between the user and the received messages, received messages that are unimportant to the user and (B) identifying characteristics of the unimportant received messages, (3) receiving an incoming message at the messaging account, (4) determining, based on a comparison between at least one characteristic of the incoming message and the message characteristics that are indicative of unimportant messages, that the incoming message is unimportant to the user, and (5) archiving the incoming message based on the determination that the incoming message is unimportant to the user. Various other methods, systems, and computer-readable media are also disclosed.