Message Ordering and Idempotency Enforcement via View Buffers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Systems with event-sourced architectures face challenges in ensuring in-order processing of asynchronous messages, avoiding reprocessing, handling out-of-order messages, and maintaining idempotency, especially in distributed environments with latency and varying data consistency.

Innovation Solution

A message ordering and idempotency enforcement process that utilizes a view manager to receive messages with entity IDs and sequence numbers, inspect their content, select relevant views, and use buffers to ensure sequential processing, discarding duplicates, and handling errors by logging and continuing with the next message.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If asynchronous message delivery is used to improve system flexibility and scalability, then system adaptability is improved, but message ordering and processing reliability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem flexibilityVSAvoidmessage ordering
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-allocating buffers for each view and entity ID combination before messages arrive. These buffers are initialized with sequence number tracking structures, allowing the system to immediately accept and properly sequence incoming asynchronous messages without compromising ordering guarantees. This pre-prepared infrastructure enables reliable ordered processing while maintaining asynchronous delivery flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces buffers as intermediary structures between the asynchronous message delivery system and the final processing logic. These buffers act as mediators that receive out-of-order messages, store them temporarily, and release them in the correct sequence order to views. This intermediary layer decouples the asynchronous delivery mechanism from the ordering requirement, allowing both to coexist without conflict.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If message buffering and sequencing mechanisms are implemented to ensure in-order processing, then message ordering reliability is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvein-order processingVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the message processing system into distinct components: message receivers, per-view buffers, sequence trackers, and processing logic. Each buffer is independently managed for specific view-entity combinations, allowing parallel processing while maintaining individual ordering guarantees. This segmentation distributes complexity across multiple simple, specialized components rather than requiring one complex centralized ordering mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-initializing buffer structures and sequence trackers for all expected views and entity IDs before message processing begins. This upfront preparation eliminates the need for dynamic complexity management during runtime, as the buffering infrastructure is already in place to handle incoming messages according to their destination and sequence requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If duplicate message detection and filtering are implemented to enforce idempotency, then processing reliability is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveidempotencyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by maintaining sequence number trackers that record the last processed sequence number for each view and entity ID combination. Before processing a message, the system performs a quick comparison of the message's sequence number against the tracked value, enabling O(1) duplicate detection. This preliminary tracking mechanism avoids more time-consuming duplicate detection methods while ensuring idempotency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The buffer structures serve themselves by automatically tracking sequence numbers and identifying duplicates through their built-in state management. Each buffer maintains its own last-seen sequence number and can independently determine whether an incoming message is a duplicate without requiring external validation or complex coordination, enabling efficient self-service duplicate filtering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If all messages are processed for all views to ensure data consistency, then data consistency is improved, but processing efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata consistencyVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating specialized buffer instances with optimized data structures for each specific view and entity ID combination. Each buffer is tailored to its destination view's requirements, storing only the relevant subset of messages needed for that particular view. This localized optimization ensures data consistency for each view while avoiding the overhead of processing and storing all messages for all views uniformly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the message routing and processing into view-specific pathways, where messages are routed to and processed by only those views that require them based on entity ID matching and view configuration. This segmentation prevents unnecessary processing of messages in views where they don't apply, maintaining data consistency where needed while improving overall processing efficiency by eliminating redundant operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10007566B1Message ordering and idempotency enforcement process
Publication Date: 2018.06.26 APPRIVER LLC

AI summary

A message ordering and idempotency enforcement process utilizing at least one computing device ensures the ordered processing of asynchronously received messages and avoids reprocessing of messages that have already been successfully processed, the process receives a message identified by entity ID, message sequence number and content. The process identifies the message according to the entity ID, message sequence number and content and selects selected views of data from a view data repository applicable to the message and then inserts the message in a buffer according to message sequence number for execution of messages in message sequence order. The process then recording the last message processed according to message sequence number for an entity ID within each selected view in the view data repository.