Communication Device Message Priority Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current communication systems fail to prioritize user-based message data effectively, leading to potential delays or denials in critical messages, especially during emergency situations, as they do not dynamically assess message content and context for resource allocation.

Innovation Solution

A method and device that dynamically identify critical content in messages, assign priorities based on content and context analysis, and allocate resources such as packet buffer and delay to ensure seamless transmission of critical messages by using natural language processing and neural networks for vocabulary and context weighting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If messages are transmitted without priority-based resource allocation, then device complexity is reduced, but message transmission reliability deteriorates during critical situations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemessage transmission reliabilityVSAvoidresource allocation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic resource allocation where packet buffer sizes and transmission priorities are adjusted in real-time based on message content analysis. The system dynamically identifies critical messages through NLP processing and automatically allocates additional resources to high-priority messages, resolving the contradiction between reliability and complexity by making the system adaptive rather than static.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes key parameters such as packet buffer size, transmission delay, and priority level based on the analyzed content of messages. By modifying these parameters dynamically according to message criticality, the system achieves reliable transmission of important messages without requiring permanently complex resource allocation infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If static priority assignment is used for messages, then device complexity is minimized, but adaptability to critical situations deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to critical situationsVSAvoidpriority assignment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically analyzing message content through NLP and independently determining priorities without external intervention. The message processing unit autonomously identifies critical situations and adjusts resource allocation accordingly, providing adaptability to critical situations while minimizing the need for complex external control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of message content before transmission to determine priority levels. By pre-analyzing messages and preparing appropriate resource allocation in advance, the system achieves adaptability to critical situations without requiring complex real-time decision-making mechanisms during transmission.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of information

If all messages are treated equally without content analysis, then processing time is reduced, but loss of critical information increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloss of critical message informationVSAvoidmessage processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and focuses processing resources only on identifying critical elements in messages rather than processing all messages uniformly. By extracting the essential content features through NLP analysis and concentrating resources on high-priority messages, the system reduces overall processing time while preventing loss of critical information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial action by providing enhanced processing and resource allocation only to messages identified as critical, rather than treating all messages equally or over-processing all messages. This selective approach prevents loss of critical information while minimizing unnecessary processing time for non-critical messages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Productivity

If resource allocation is not dynamically adjusted, then device simplicity is maintained, but productivity of critical message transmission deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecritical message transmission productivityVSAvoidresource allocation mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the outcome of message transmission and resource utilization is continuously monitored and fed back into the priority determination process. This feedback loop enables the system to improve its resource allocation strategies over time, enhancing critical message transmission productivity while keeping the complexity manageable through iterative optimization rather than overly complex predetermined rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10917375B2Method and device for managing messages in a communication device
Publication Date: 2021.02.09 WIPRO LTD
  • US10917375B2 patent drawing
  • US10917375B2 patent drawing
  • US10917375B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of managing messages in a communication device is disclosed. The method includes receiving messages through a communication device. Critical messages may be determined by identification of one or more critical content in the one or more messages and analyzed based on the context and content associated with the critical messages. A priority for each of the critical messages may be generated by assigning vocabulary weight to the critical content and a context weight to the critical message. The critical messages may be queued based on their respective priorities. Dynamic allocation of resources by adjusting at least one of buffer, and packet delay associated with the communication device based on the priority of the one or more messages in the queue is done. The one or more messages in the communication device may be managed based on the queuing and the dynamic allocation of resources.