Message Relevance Scoring via Regard Phrase Parsing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for evaluating and sorting user-generated content in online communities face challenges due to variability in quality and the presence of biases in user feedback, which can be influenced by social obligations, making it difficult to reliably identify high-quality content.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that assigns relevance scores to message elements by parsing content and metadata to detect regard indicators such as appreciative phrase marks and actions, using a link-based rank computation method to determine the intrinsic value of content, thereby ranking messages based on user-regard expressions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If user-generated feedback (votes, ratings) is used to evaluate content quality, then content sorting and triage become possible, but the feedback becomes biased due to user-felt social obligations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent evaluation efficiencyVSAvoidfeedback accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary system that analyzes linguistic expressions of regard in message contents rather than directly using user feedback metadata. This intermediary layer (language analysis) mediates between the biased user feedback and the final quality assessment, extracting objective signals from textual expressions while filtering out social obligation biases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of direct user feedback (votes, ratings) with a linguistic analysis system that processes message contents. Instead of relying on users to explicitly rate content, the system substitutes this with automated detection of regard-expressing language patterns, transforming the evaluation mechanism from explicit mechanical feedback to implicit linguistic analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of manufacture

If traditional user feedback mechanisms are used, then content evaluation is simple to implement, but the quality assessment becomes unreliable due to social biases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem implementation simplicityVSAvoidcontent quality measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the simple but biased mechanical feedback system with a sophisticated linguistic analysis system. The new system processes message contents through parsing and pattern recognition to detect regard indicators, substituting the simple vote/rating mechanism with a more complex but accurate language-based evaluation approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the evaluation parameter from explicit feedback metadata (votes, ratings) to implicit linguistic features within message contents. By analyzing the presence and frequency of regard-expressing phrases and patterns in the text itself, the system transforms the measurement parameter from user actions to linguistic characteristics, improving accuracy while maintaining implementation feasibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If user feedback is collected and processed, then content sorting is enabled, but the feedback contains biases from social interactions that reduce evaluation reliability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent sorting capabilityVSAvoidevaluation trustworthiness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces linguistic analysis as an intermediary between user interactions and content evaluation. Instead of directly using feedback from social interactions, the system inserts a mediation layer that analyzes message contents for regard indicators, filtering out biases inherent in social feedback while preserving the sorting capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts relevant evaluation signals from message contents by detecting specific linguistic patterns that express regard. This extraction process separates the trustworthy linguistic indicators of quality from the biased social feedback metadata, taking out only the reliable signals needed for accurate content evaluation and sorting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS9058376B2Scoring of interrelated message elements
Publication Date: 2015.06.16 ALCMEON
  • US9058376B2 patent drawing
  • US9058376B2 patent drawing
  • US9058376B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A structured collection of message elements comprising message elements and oriented child-parent links each connecting a message element to a parent message element is provided. Each message element comprises a message content and metadata including an author identity and a timestamp. The message contents are parsed to generate appreciative phrase marks assigned to the message elements. An appreciative phrase mark is generated in response to detecting that the parsed message content of a later message element comprises a string of characters that matches an entry within a predefined dictionary of regard-expressing phrases. The appreciative phrase mark is assigned to an earlier message element that is connected to the later message element by a sequence of child-parent links. The metadata is parsed to detect the marks and further regard indicators assigned to the message elements. Relevance scores of the message elements are computed as a function of the regard indicators.