Crowd-Determined Message Response System Priority Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users face challenges in identifying the right person to respond to messages, especially when seeking domain expertise outside their trusted social network, leading to missed opportunities for timely and relevant responses.

Innovation Solution

A crowd-determined message response system that allows recipients to select a designated respondent and adjust message priorities, reweighting messages to prioritize the selected recipient and demote unselected ones, ensuring that messages from the best-suited individuals are highlighted and others are minimized.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a user sends messages to a large population to increase response probability, then the likelihood of getting a response increases, but the volume of messages to process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse probabilityVSAvoidmessage volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the large population of recipients into smaller groups based on their selection of designated respondents. Each user receives messages only from those they have designated, dividing the overwhelming volume into manageable segments while maintaining high response probability through targeted distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of message distribution from broad population casting to targeted distribution based on user preferences and historical response patterns. By adjusting the distribution parameter to match recipient expertise and availability, the system achieves high response rates with reduced message volumes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of time

If a user selectively processes messages only from their network, then processing time is reduced, but domain expertise outside the network is missed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemessage processing timeVSAvoiddomain expertise
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary mechanism where users designate specific respondents from outside their network for particular message types or topics. This intermediary layer filters and routes messages to appropriate experts while keeping the user's direct processing load manageable, bridging the gap between selective processing and expert access.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

Users perform preliminary action by pre-designating respondents for different message categories or expertise areas. This advance preparation creates a routing map that automatically directs messages to the right people without requiring real-time decision-making, reducing processing time while ensuring expert coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If multiple recipients are on the distribution list, then the chance of getting a response increases, but it becomes unclear who should respond

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse likelihoodVSAvoidresponse clarity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by assigning different priority levels and response expectations to different recipients based on their designated status. Messages are tagged with indicators showing which recipients are primary respondents versus secondary copies, making it clear who should take action while maintaining broad notification for awareness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where recipients can indicate their availability and expertise preferences. This feedback is used to dynamically adjust message routing and priority, ensuring that the most appropriate person responds while maintaining high response likelihood through multiple notified parties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Productivity

If message priority is adjusted for designated recipients, then response efficiency improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses dynamic priority adjustment where message importance and recipient priority levels are not fixed but adapt based on user behavior, response history, and contextual factors. This dynamic approach optimizes response efficiency by automatically adjusting priorities without requiring complex manual configuration, as the system learns and adapts over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10015126B2Crowd determined message response system
Publication Date: 2018.07.03 AIRBNB INC
  • US10015126B2 patent drawing
  • US10015126B2 patent drawing
  • US10015126B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A crowd determined message response system may be provided. A message sent from a sender to at least one recipient over a communication network may be received. The message may be presented on a user interface device. A selection of a designated recipient for responding to the message may be received. A priority of the message sent to the designated recipient may be adjusted. The priority of the message sent to an unselected recipient of the message not selected as the designated recipient may be adjusted. The priority may be adjusted differently for the designated recipient and the unselected recipient. Based on the adjusting of the priority of the message sent to the unselected recipient, the order of importance in which the unselected recipient's messages are presented may be rearranged.