Electronic Message Routing with Regulatory Policy Validation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current technologies fail to comply with complex legal, regulatory, and cultural expectations for data aggregation and processing, leading to erosion of public trust and the need for a system that continuously tracks and manages data transmission to ensure compliance with varying regulations and policies.

Innovation Solution

A regulation-based electronic message routing system that uses labels encapsulated in message headers to manage payload-level availability zones, ensuring compliance by applying regulatory and policy rules through a secure, ledger-bound data store and distributed routers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional routing systems are used, then network communication speed and simplicity are maintained, but compliance with complex legal and regulatory requirements cannot be ensured

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregulatory complianceVSAvoidrouting system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the routing decision-making process into multiple components: payload analysis module that extracts regulatory indicators from message content, rules engine that evaluates compliance requirements, and routing module that selects appropriate paths. This segmentation allows the system to handle regulatory complexity in a structured way without overwhelming the entire routing system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary rules engine that acts as a mediator between the payload analysis module and the routing module. This rules engine contains the regulatory logic and compliance rules, separating the complexity of regulatory requirements from the core routing functionality. The intermediary processes compliance checks and translates regulatory requirements into routing decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If payload-level regulatory control is implemented, then compliance accuracy is improved, but processing time and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance detection accuracyVSAvoidmessage processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by pre-configuring regulatory rules and compliance criteria in the rules engine before runtime. The system pre-identifies regulatory indicators in payloads and pre-determines compliance requirements, so that during actual message routing, the system only needs to evaluate pre-processed information against stored rules, significantly reducing real-time processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes parameters by analyzing different aspects of the payload depending on the message type and regulatory context. The payload analysis module dynamically adjusts which parameters to extract and evaluate based on message characteristics, focusing computational resources on the most relevant compliance indicators rather than uniformly processing all payload elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If continuous regulatory tracking is implemented, then compliance reliability is improved, but computational resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous compliance monitoringVSAvoidcomputational resource usage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service by enabling the routing system to automatically update its knowledge of regulatory requirements through the continuous regulatory tracking module. The system autonomously monitors regulatory changes, updates the rules engine, and adjusts routing decisions without requiring external intervention or manual configuration, maintaining reliable compliance monitoring while optimizing resource usage through automated processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs periodic action by implementing continuous regulatory tracking that operates at strategically determined intervals rather than constantly analyzing every message against all possible regulations. The system periodically updates regulatory knowledge bases and applies compliance checks at key decision points in the routing process, maintaining monitoring reliability while reducing unnecessary computational overhead during steady-state operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS12483599B2Regulation-based electronic message routing
Publication Date: 2025.11.25 QOMPLX INC
  • US12483599B2 patent drawing
  • US12483599B2 patent drawing
  • US12483599B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for regulation-based electronic message routing using an expanded open system interconnection (“OSI”) model. Information regulations and information policy rules comprise three additional layers beyond the standard seven-layer OSI model from a data store. Electronic messages are routed using a handling policy rule generator to validate destination, storage, and transport.