Messaging Status Mirroring for Synchronized Availability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Instant messaging systems lack effective mechanisms to dynamically adjust user messaging status based on the availability of other users, leading to potential interruptions and inefficient communication.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that determine and set a messaging status for a second user based on the messaging status of a first user, considering predefined preferences, common scheduling events, proximity, and specific messaging status mirroring, to ensure synchronized availability indicators.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If messaging status is manually set by each user, then user control over availability is maintained, but communication efficiency decreases due to potential interruptions and lack of synchronization

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvecommunication efficiencyVSAvoiduser control

Core Design Contradiction:

ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically copies the messaging status from one user to another user based on predefined relationships or conditions. When the first user sets their messaging status (available, busy, offline), the second user's status is automatically updated to match, eliminating manual status setting while preserving coordinated availability indication.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system establishes a feedback mechanism where the messaging status of one user automatically triggers status updates in another user's profile. This creates a synchronized feedback loop that maintains consistent availability information across related users without requiring manual intervention, thereby improving communication efficiency.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If messaging status is dynamically adjusted based on other users' availability, then communication efficiency improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:

Improvecommunication efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity

Core Design Contradiction:

ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-establishes the relationships and rules for status mirroring before they are needed. Users can pre-configure which users should have their status mirrored, and the system pre-processes status changes by automatically propagating them to related users. This preliminary configuration reduces the complexity of real-time decision-making during actual messaging operations.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #10Preliminary action

3Object-affected harmful factors

If messaging status is synchronized across users, then interruptions are reduced, but loss of individual status information occurs

Engineering Contradiction:

ImproveinterruptionsVSAvoidindividual status information

Core Design Contradiction:

Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the messaging status information by maintaining separate status profiles for each user while establishing selective synchronization relationships. Each user retains their own independent status settings and can override the mirrored status when needed. The synchronization operates at the relationship level rather than globally, preserving individual status information while reducing unwanted interruptions through coordinated status indication.

Inventive Principle:

Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS9009238B2Mirroring messaging status

Publication Date: 2015.04.14 WRP IP MANAGEMENT LLC

AI summary

A messaging status associated with a first user is determined. A messaging status associated with a second user is set based upon, at least in part, the determined messaging status associated with the first user.