Meta-Model Topology Integration for Content Moderation Graphs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional machine learning models, particularly large language models (LLMs), face challenges in managing complex interactions, hardware overtaxing, and generating undesired content, such as hate speech, due to the complexity of integrating multiple models and evolving frameworks.

Innovation Solution

The deployment and moderation of meta-model topologies and model graphs that incorporate a global label schema, allowing for streamlined integration and moderation of content across multiple models, including functions for content moderation, annotation, and generation, with dynamic batching and auto-scaling to improve efficiency and reduce latency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple machine learning models are integrated to process input prompts, then the functionality and versatility of the system is improved, but the device complexity and difficulty of operation increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovefunctionalityVSAvoidcomplexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple discrete machine learning models into a unified model graph structure where nodes represent models and edges represent data flow. This merging approach maintains the functionality of individual models while presenting a simplified unified interface to users, reducing operational complexity despite increased versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The model graph framework serves as a universal container that can accommodate various types of machine learning models (LLMs, classifiers, generators) with different functions. This multi-functional framework allows diverse models to be integrated through a common interface, improving versatility without proportionally increasing operational difficulty.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple machine learning models are used to process prompts, then the system capabilities are improved, but the ease of operation deteriorates as users must navigate through different models and interfaces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem capabilitiesVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The model graph acts as an intermediary layer between users and the complex ensemble of machine learning models. Users interact with the unified model graph interface rather than navigating individual model interfaces, which maintains access to multiple model capabilities while significantly improving ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If computer hardware processes workloads from multiple users and models, then the service coverage is improved, but the reliability deteriorates as hardware becomes overtaxed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice coverageVSAvoidhardware reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically scales and adjusts model graph instances based on workload demands. When hardware becomes overtaxed from serving multiple users, the system can dynamically instantiate additional model graph copies or adjust resource allocation, maintaining service coverage while preventing hardware overload and preserving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Adaptability or versatility

If new machine learning models are developed and interlinked with existing models, then the adaptability is improved, but the device complexity increases making coordination and integration difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoidintegration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the integration process into standardized components: models are represented as discrete nodes with defined input/output interfaces, and relationships are represented as edges. This segmentation allows new models to be independently developed and then easily integrated into the model graph by connecting nodes through standardized interfaces, improving adaptability while managing integration complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12353367B2Deployment of meta-model topologies and moderating graph generation
Publication Date: 2025.07.08 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US12353367B2 patent drawing
  • US12353367B2 patent drawing
  • US12353367B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A meta-model topology comprises a plurality of functions and conforms to a global label schema. A new function not included in the plurality of functions is integrated into the meta-model topology. A particular label of interest that is associated with the new function is identified and the new function is configured such that an output from the new function conforms to an output form corresponding to the particular label of interest from the global label schema. The new function is then integrated into the meta-model topology and the meta-model topology that includes the new function is used to generate a model graph. The model graph is then deployed to a remote application that is configured to receive data prompts comprising input data processed by nodes of the model graph.