Metadata-Based Anatomy Recognition for Efficient Medical Image Routing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Large medical organizations face challenges in routing medical data between different systems due to the large size of medical images and varying metadata formats, leading to inefficient processing and resource usage, particularly in identifying and routing relevant anatomical views for clinical software applications.

Innovation Solution

A metadata-based anatomy recognition system that uses a model to infer anatomical classifications from metadata, such as DICOM tags, to improve the routing of medical images to appropriate clinical applications, reducing unnecessary processing and resource usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If pixel data is transferred to infer anatomy, then anatomy identification accuracy is improved, but data transfer volume and processing time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanatomy identification accuracyVSAvoiddata transfer volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential metadata elements (DICOM tags containing anatomical information) from the complete medical image data, separating the anatomy identification function from the full pixel data transfer. This allows anatomy inference to proceed with minimal data extraction rather than transferring entire image datasets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the medical image data into distinct components: metadata (DICOM tags) and pixel data. By identifying and processing only the metadata segment for anatomy inference, the system achieves accurate anatomy identification without the overhead of transferring and processing complete pixel data sets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If complete studies are transferred for processing, then clinical application processing completeness is improved, but network traffic and processing overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing completenessVSAvoidnetwork traffic
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and transfers only the essential metadata components required for anatomy identification and clinical application routing, rather than transferring complete medical studies. This selective extraction maintains processing reliability by providing sufficient anatomical information while dramatically reducing network traffic volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Adaptability or versatility

If metadata is manually input, then flexibility in metadata format is improved, but metadata reliability decreases due to errors and inconsistencies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemetadata format flexibilityVSAvoidmetadata accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary anatomy recognition model that processes metadata from multiple sources and standardizes it into consistent anatomical classifications. This intermediary layer mediates between diverse manual input formats and the requirements for reliable, consistent metadata, improving accuracy while maintaining format flexibility through the modeling process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Measurement precision

If pixel-based anatomy recognition is used, then anatomy identification accuracy is improved, but computational complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanatomy identification accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the essential anatomical information from complex pixel data into simplified metadata representations. By working with these extracted metadata features rather than raw pixel data, the system maintains anatomy identification accuracy while significantly reducing computational complexity and processing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the anatomy recognition task into two stages: first extracting anatomical information into metadata during image acquisition, then performing recognition on the segmented metadata rather than processing complete pixel data. This segmentation reduces computational complexity while preserving identification accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250259420A1Systems and methods for metadata-based anatomy recognition
Publication Date: 2025.08.14 BLACKFORD ANALYSIS
  • US20250259420A1 patent drawing
  • US20250259420A1 patent drawing
  • US20250259420A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided are computer-implemented systems and methods for metadata-based anatomy recognition and computer-implemented systems and methods for generating a model for metadata-based anatomy recognition. The metadata-based anatomy recognition includes: providing, in a memory in communication with a processor, a model for metadata-based anatomy recognition; receiving, using a network device in communication with the processor, at least one medical image object comprising a plurality of metadata; determining, at the processor, a predicted anatomy classification associated with the at least one medical image object based on the model for metadata-based anatomy recognition and the plurality of metadata; and storing, in the memory, the predicted anatomy classification in association with the at least one medical image object in a database.