Information Processing System Using Metadata for Related Document Retrieval

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing document retrieval systems require manual user input of keywords for finding related documents, which may fail to display relevant documents even when they exist, especially in cases where appropriate keywords are not used.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that automatically extracts metadata from documents, creates retrieval phrases, and retrieves related documents based on metadata, displaying them as candidates for easy user association.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual keyword retrieval is used, then user control over retrieval is maintained, but retrieval accuracy decreases when appropriate keywords are not used

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveretrieval accuracyVSAvoiduser operation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically extracts metadata from the current document and uses it to retrieve related documents without requiring manual keyword input from the user. The retrieval phrase creation unit generates search queries based on extracted metadata, enabling the system to serve itself in the retrieval process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The metadata extraction unit pre-extracts relevant information from documents and stores it in the database. When a document is viewed, the retrieval phrase creation unit immediately uses the pre-extracted metadata to generate retrieval phrases, eliminating the need for users to manually think about and input appropriate keywords.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If automatic metadata extraction is implemented, then retrieval accuracy improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveretrieval accuracyVSAvoidsystem structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into distinct functional units: metadata extraction unit, database unit, retrieval phrase creation unit, and related document retrieval unit. Each unit performs a specific task, making the overall complex process manageable and maintainable through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The metadata acts as an intermediary between the document content and the retrieval process. Instead of directly analyzing full document content during retrieval, the system uses pre-extracted metadata as a bridge, simplifying the retrieval operation while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Loss of time

If manual keyword input is required, then user intent is precisely captured, but time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveretrieval timeVSAvoidretrieval completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The metadata extraction process runs continuously in the background as documents are stored or accessed, so that when retrieval is needed, the metadata is already prepared and ready to use, eliminating delays associated with on-demand keyword analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS20250252129A1Computer-implemented method and information processing system
Publication Date: 2025.08.07 LEGALON TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US20250252129A1 patent drawing
  • US20250252129A1 patent drawing
  • US20250252129A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method comprises one or more processors configured to display a first document on a document browsing screen, retrieve, from a storage, a second document that is a document different from the first document and includes information corresponding to attribute information acquired from the first document, display the second document as a candidate for a related document related to the first document, and register the first document and the second document as related documents.