Real-Time Metadata Comparison for Repository Object Discovery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users face inefficiencies in discovering the most useful objects in a repository due to limited or aggregated metadata display when selecting multiple objects, requiring manual analysis of each object's metadata or contents.

Innovation Solution

A system that compares metadata in real-time to identify the most useful objects based on categories like most viewed, most liked, or also viewed, and displays this information through user interface icons, color highlighting, or summary panels, allowing users to select comparison categories for efficient object identification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If metadata is displayed for multiple selected objects, then users can see aggregation information (total size, total number of objects), but individual unique metadata values (such as author names) are not shown when they differ across objects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of objects displayedVSAvoidindividual metadata values
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The metadata display is segmented into two distinct sections: aggregation metadata (common to all objects) and individual metadata (unique to each object). This segmentation allows both types of information to be displayed simultaneously without conflict, resolving the contradiction between showing multiple objects and preserving individual metadata values.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a new display dimension by organizing metadata into hierarchical levels: group-level aggregation metadata and object-level individual metadata. This dimensional organization enables the system to display both summary information and detailed individual information without overlapping or obscuring either type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Loss of information

If users select each individual object one at a time to view metadata, then complete metadata information is available for each object, but the process becomes time-consuming and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemetadata completenessVSAvoidtime to discover useful object
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-calculating and displaying aggregation metadata for all selected objects before the user needs to identify the most useful object. This preliminary display of summary information allows users to quickly assess multiple objects without having to open each one individually, significantly reducing discovery time while maintaining metadata completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms through comparison categories (most viewed, most liked, also viewed) that provide real-time information about object popularity and relevance. This feedback allows users to quickly identify useful objects based on aggregated user behavior data, eliminating the need to manually review each object's metadata in detail.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If the system displays aggregated metadata values for selected objects, then summary information (total size, total count) is available, but the utility of the metadata decreases when all objects have unique values for a particular attribute

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediscovery efficiencyVSAvoidindividual object differentiation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The metadata display is segmented into aggregation metadata section and individual metadata section. Aggregation metadata shows summary information (total size, total count) that is useful for overview, while individual metadata displays unique attributes (author names, specific timestamps) that differentiate objects. This segmentation maintains both productivity through quick summary viewing and information completeness through individual object differentiation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by displaying different levels of detail at different locations in the interface. Summary aggregation metadata is displayed at the group level for quick overview, while individual object metadata is displayed at the object level for detailed examination. This localized quality adjustment allows the system to optimize for both efficiency and information completeness depending on the user's immediate needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS8918419B2Object comparison via real time metadata calculation
Publication Date: 2014.12.23 SAP SE
  • US8918419B2 patent drawing
  • US8918419B2 patent drawing
  • US8918419B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for real-time comparison of data objects stored in a repository. A comparison of a plurality of selected objects may be implemented. A metadata comparison summary may be displayed to the user. The comparison summary may identity the most viewed, most liked, most disliked, or also viewed objects. The metadata comparison may be displayed on a user interface via the addition of an identification icon, by color highlighting a list of objects in the repository, by displaying a comparison summary in an information panel, or by other methods of object identification. In an embodiment, the user may control the type of information displayed in the comparison summary.