Social Network Metadata Confidence Scoring via User Characteristics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional social networking systems struggle to evaluate the reliability of metadata provided by users who have not previously contributed metadata, leading to potential association of inaccurate or malicious information with objects.

Innovation Solution

The system determines a confidence value for users by assessing their prior metadata contributions and, if insufficient, uses user characteristics like demographic information and interactions to calculate a confidence value using machine-learned models, thereby validating the accuracy of new metadata before association.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the social networking system evaluates user reliability based on previously provided metadata, then the accuracy of metadata verification is improved, but users who have not previously provided metadata cannot be evaluated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemetadata verification accuracyVSAvoidevaluation coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the evaluation parameters from relying solely on historical metadata contributions to incorporating multiple user characteristics including demographic information, connection strength, interaction patterns, and interest alignment. This allows the confidence value calculation to adapt to users with varying levels of prior engagement while maintaining evaluation accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The evaluation process is segmented into two pathways: one for users with sufficient historical metadata (using direct comparison methods) and another for new or low-activity users (using characteristic-based confidence calculation). This segmentation allows each user group to be evaluated using the most appropriate method for their situation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Quantity of substance

If the system accepts metadata from all users regardless of reliability, then user contribution volume increases, but inaccurate or malicious metadata may be associated with objects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemetadata contribution volumeVSAvoidmetadata accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where metadata from users with insufficient history is initially held in a pending state. Once the confidence value is calculated based on user characteristics and the metadata is associated with an object, the system continues to monitor the object's data for inconsistencies, providing ongoing validation feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The confidence value calculation based on user characteristics serves as an intermediary assessment layer between user-submitted metadata and its association with objects. This intermediary evaluation filters metadata before association, allowing the system to accept contributions from all users while maintaining accuracy standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If the system verifies metadata through comparison with additional users' metadata, then metadata accuracy is improved, but the process becomes more complex and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemetadata accuracyVSAvoidverification process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary evaluation by calculating confidence values based on user characteristics before metadata verification is attempted. This preliminary assessment filters out low-confidence users early, reducing the need for complex verification processes for their metadata and streamlining the overall verification workflow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10061797B2Evaluating likely accuracy of metadata received from social networking system users based on user characteristics
Publication Date: 2018.08.28 META PLATFORMS INC
  • US10061797B2 patent drawing
  • US10061797B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A social networking system allows its users to provide metadata for association with objects maintained by the social networking system. Some of the metadata may be presented to other users along with the object. To prevent association of inaccurate metadata with an object, the social networking system determines a confidence value associated with a user who provided metadata for association with an object. The confidence value indicates of the accuracy of metadata provided by the user relative to information associated with the object. If the user has previously provided less than a threshold amount of metadata to associate with objects, the confidence score is determined using characteristics associated with the user by the social networking system. The metadata provided by the user is stored but not associated with the object if the user's confidence value is less than a threshold value.