Data Packet Metadata Stabilization via Dynamic Recipient Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing data packet metadata stabilization methods in content distribution networks are inefficient, as they lack dynamic recipient selection and feedback loops to adjust content delivery based on user responses, leading to unstable metadata and potential content delivery issues.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilize a content database and user profile database to identify unstable data packet metadata, dynamically select recipients based on correspondence with user data, and update metadata through feedback loops until stability is achieved, using a piecewise Gaussian distribution model to assess difficulty levels and load thresholds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If data packet metadata is stabilized using traditional methods, then metadata stability is improved, but content delivery efficiency deteriorates due to lack of dynamic adjustment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemetadata stabilityVSAvoidcontent delivery efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic metadata stabilization by continuously monitoring recipient responses and adjusting metadata difficulty levels in real-time. The system transitions from static metadata to dynamic metadata that adapts based on user feedback, allowing the system to maintain stability while improving content delivery efficiency through continuous optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent establishes a feedback loop where recipient responses to data packets are collected and used to update metadata. The system monitors whether recipients successfully process packets and uses this information to adjust difficulty levels and select future recipients, creating a self-improving system that stabilizes metadata while enhancing delivery efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If dynamic recipient selection is implemented, then content delivery efficiency is improved, but system complexity increases due to feedback loop requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent delivery efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service mechanisms where the system automatically selects recipients based on metadata difficulty levels and user profiles without manual intervention. The feedback loop operates autonomously, with the system independently monitoring responses, updating metadata, and selecting future recipients, thereby reducing operational complexity despite increased algorithmic sophistication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces metadata as an intermediary element that mediates between content packets and recipients. The metadata acts as a bridge, encoding difficulty information that guides recipient selection algorithms, thereby simplifying the overall system architecture by decoupling the complexity of recipient selection from the core content delivery mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If feedback loops are used to update metadata, then metadata accuracy is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemetadata accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by updating metadata selectively based on the confidence level of difficulty estimates. When metadata accuracy is sufficient, the system stops updating to avoid unnecessary processing time. The feedback loop performs only the minimum necessary updates to achieve stabilization, balancing accuracy improvement with time efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary action by pre-calculating difficulty levels and preparing metadata updates before they are strictly needed. The system anticipates when metadata will need updating and performs preparations in advance, reducing the actual processing time when updates occur while maintaining high accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10333857B1Systems and methods for data packet metadata stabilization
Publication Date: 2019.06.25 PEARSON EDUCATION INC
  • US10333857B1 patent drawing
  • US10333857B1 patent drawing
  • US10333857B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for accelerated stabilization of data packet metadata are disclosed herein. The system can include a memory having a content database and a user profile database. The system can include a user device having a first network interface and a first I/O subsystem. The system can include one or more servers. The one or more servers can: retrieve data packet metadata for a data packet; determine that the data packet metadata is unstable; identify a set of potential recipients of the data packet; select one of the set of potential recipients as the recipient of the data packet; provide the data packet to the recipient of the data packet; receive a response from the recipient to the provided data packet; and automatically update the data packet metadata based on the response received from the recipient.