Metadata Tag Evaluation System for Acronym Expansion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Metadata tags, often used as acronyms or newly created terms, can be unrecognizable to users, making it difficult for them to understand the context or meaning behind the tags, especially when they are not self-identifiable.

Innovation Solution

A metadata tag evaluation system that utilizes a probability matrix to identify an expanded metadata tag from a set of characters, retrieves descriptive content associated with the tag, and generates a description based on this content, providing users with a clearer understanding of the tag's meaning and related information.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If metadata tags use acronyms or newly created terms to enable concise tagging, then tagging efficiency is improved, but user recognizability and understanding of tag meaning deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetagging efficiencyVSAvoidtag meaning understanding
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary system (metadata tag evaluation component) that mediates between the concise acronym tags and users. This component probabilistically evaluates acronyms to generate expanded descriptions, allowing tags to remain concise while providing meaning explanations to users who need them.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of tag representation by maintaining the original concise acronym form while generating an expanded descriptive form probabilistically. This allows the same tag to serve dual purposes: concise identification and meaningful explanation, depending on user needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of energy

If the metadata tag evaluation component is hosted locally to reduce bandwidth utilization, then network bandwidth consumption is reduced, but device processor utilization and memory requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebandwidth utilizationVSAvoidprocessor utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by allowing different deployment configurations: the evaluation component can be hosted locally on user devices for bandwidth efficiency, or remotely on servers for processor efficiency. This localized decision-making allows optimization based on specific user needs and device capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Use of energy by moving object

If the metadata tag evaluation component is hosted remotely to reduce device processor utilization, then device resource consumption is reduced, but network bandwidth utilization and latency increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessor utilizationVSAvoidbandwidth utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system allows remote hosting of the evaluation component, enabling users with limited device resources to offload processing to servers. This creates a quality difference in deployment options where remote hosting benefits mobile devices while centralized servers handle the computational load.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Measurement precision

If probabilistic evaluation is used to expand metadata tags, then accuracy of tag expansion is improved, but processing time and computational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetag expansion accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by using probabilistic evaluation only when needed (when users query unclear tags) rather than expanding all tags universally. The system balances accuracy requirements with processing efficiency by selectively applying the expansion mechanism based on user needs and tag clarity assessments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20190287019A1Metadata tag description generation
Publication Date: 2019.09.19 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US20190287019A1 patent drawing
  • US20190287019A1 patent drawing
  • US20190287019A1 patent drawing

AI summary

One or more techniques and/or systems are provided for metadata tag evaluation. For example, a metadata tag, associated with content, may be identified (e.g., a hashtag #ML may be used to tag a social network post). A set of characters, within the content, may be evaluated utilizing a probability matrix and the content to identify an expanded metadata tag (e.g., an expanded hashtag “machine learning”). Descriptive content, such as websites, articles, social network posts, and/or other content associated with the expanded metadata tag, may be retrieved. A description for the metadata tag may be generated based upon the descriptive content (e.g., a definition for machine learning). In this way, the description, related metadata tags, and/or supplemental content may be provided to users having an interest in learning about the metadata tag.