Metadata-Driven UI Test Validation System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Developing and modifying user interfaces (UIs) often require extensive and error-prone manual testing, which is time-consuming and prone to human errors, leading to disruptions in user productivity and dissatisfaction.

Innovation Solution

A user interface test and validation system that automatically generates test scripts using provided UI settings, metadata, and annotations, allowing for the validation of UI elements without manual coding or test script writing, enabling automated testing during design time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual testing is performed for UI validation, then testing coverage can be customized, but time consumption and error rate increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting accuracyVSAvoidtesting time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service automated testing by allowing the UI testing framework to automatically generate and execute test scripts based on UI configuration files, eliminating the need for manual test script writing and execution while maintaining comprehensive testing coverage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Test scripts are generated in advance during the build process or before execution, based on pre-defined UI configuration files that describe the expected UI state, allowing the system to prepare all necessary test cases before actual UI validation occurs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If comprehensive test scripts are written for all UI variations, then testing thoroughness improves, but development time and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting thoroughnessVSAvoiddevelopment efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates virtual copies of the expected UI state through configuration files that describe the desired UI appearance and behavior, allowing automated comparison between actual and expected states without manually creating physical test artifacts for each UI variation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

A single UI configuration file serves multiple purposes: it defines the expected UI state for testing, describes the UI structure for validation, and provides the basis for generating test scripts, eliminating the need for separate test script files for each UI scenario

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If manual test script writing is required, then testing can be performed, but human error and variability increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting capabilityVSAvoidconsistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces the mechanical process of manual test script writing and execution with an automated computational system that reads UI configuration files, generates test scripts programmatically, and executes validation automatically, eliminating human error and variability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements automated feedback loops where test execution results are automatically compared against expected UI states defined in configuration files, and validation pass/fail information is immediately reported, eliminating the need for manual interpretation and reducing human error in result assessment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11442750B2Metadata driven user interface test and validation system
Publication Date: 2022.09.13 SAP SE
  • US11442750B2 patent drawing
  • US11442750B2 patent drawing
  • US11442750B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various embodiments for providing a user interface test and validation system are described herein. An embodiment operates by determining user interface (UI) settings and metadata, and fetching data corresponding to the metadata. A plurality of test procedures corresponding to the UI element are identified. A plurality of states to be present in a rendering of the UI element based on the plurality of test procedures, the metadata, and the data are identified. A rendering of the UI element is validated against the plurality of states. A test report is provided based on the validating.