Metal Carbide Gate Structures for MOSFET Work Function Tuning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

As MOSFET devices are scaled down, replacing polysilicon with metal as a gate electrode material makes it difficult to tune the work function difference between the gate and channel, leading to challenges in modifying the threshold voltage, and traditional work-function layers are less conductive, resulting in performance losses.

Innovation Solution

The method involves forming metal carbide materials using multiple processes with different precursors to deposit discrete or mixed metal carbide layers, allowing for adjustment of the composition and properties of the metal carbide material to tune electrical properties such as work function and resistivity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If metal replaces polysilicon as gate electrode material, then device performance is improved, but work function tuning becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice performanceVSAvoidwork function tuning
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The gate electrode is segmented into multiple layers: a metal layer for high performance and a separate metal carbide work function layer for tuning capabilities. This segmentation allows each layer to fulfill its specific function independently, resolving the contradiction between performance and tunability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The gate electrode uses a composite structure combining metal and metal carbide materials. The metal provides high conductivity and performance, while the metal carbide layer provides work function tuning capability, achieving both improved performance and retained adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Adaptability or versatility

If traditional work-function layers are added to tune work function, then work function adjustment is achieved, but conductivity is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvework function adjustmentVSAvoidconductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The work function layer's conductivity is optimized by controlling its composition parameters (metal identity, carbide stoichiometry) and physical parameters (thickness). By adjusting these parameters, the layer achieves sufficient conductivity while maintaining work function tuning capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The work function layer uses composite metal carbide materials that combine metallic character (for conductivity) with carbide character (for work function control). This composite approach allows simultaneous achievement of both conductivity and work function adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Manufacturing precision

If multiple deposition processes are used to form metal carbide layers, then composition control is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomposition controlVSAvoidmanufacturing process
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple deposition processes (PVD, CVD, ALD) are merged into an integrated fabrication sequence, where each process deposits specific layers or compositions. This combining approach achieves precise composition control while managing overall manufacturing complexity through process integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the manipulation of resistivity and work function of metal carbide structures, achieving desired performance by adjusting the composition and thickness of metal carbide layers, which is not achievable with typical metal carbide materials.

Implementation Method 1

The two or more processes can use, for example, at least one different precursor, to adjust the composition or properties of the metal carbide layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical Vapour Deposition: Physical Vapour Deposition

Implementation Method 2

depositing a first metal carbide layer using a first precursor and a second precursor; and depositing a second metal carbide layer using a third precursor and a fourth precursor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical Vapour Deposition: Chemical Vapour Deposition

Data Source

PatentUS11926895B2Structures including metal carbide material, devices including the structures, and methods of forming same
Publication Date: 2024.03.12 ASM IP HLDG BV
  • US11926895B2 patent drawing
  • US11926895B2 patent drawing
  • US11926895B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods of forming thin-film structures including metal carbide material, and structures and devices including the metal carbide material are disclosed. Exemplary structures include metal carbide material formed using two or more different processes (e.g., two or more different precursors), which enables tuning of various metal carbide material properties, including resistivity, current leakage, and work function.