Variable-Thickness Metal Container Necking Without Buckling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The metal container industry faces challenges in efficiently necking and expanding containers with varying sidewall thicknesses, leading to issues like collapse, buckling, and frictional defects due to existing necking and expansion processes.

Innovation Solution

The use of textured necking dies with a land and relief surface, and expansion dies with a progressively expanding portion and undercut, allows for aggressive necking and expansion while minimizing frictional contact and physical defects, enabling the production of containers with varying thicknesses without collapse or damage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional necking dies with polished surfaces are used, then the necking process is simple, but the container experiences collapse, buckling, and frictional defects during necking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontainer integrity during neckingVSAvoidnecking die structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The necking die incorporates different surface finishes in different zones: a polished necking surface (Ra ≤ 0.8 µm) in the contact zone to reduce friction, and a non-polished relief surface (Ra ≥ 3.2 µm) in the non-contact zone to provide structural support and prevent buckling. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction by providing both low friction where needed and structural integrity where required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The necking die is segmented into distinct functional zones: a necking surface zone for diameter reduction and a relief zone for structural support. This segmentation allows each zone to be optimized independently - the necking surface for minimal friction and the relief surface for preventing collapse - thereby resolving the contradiction between reliability and structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If aggressive necking is performed to achieve greater diameter reduction, then productivity increases, but the container suffers from collapse and buckling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenecking efficiencyVSAvoidcontainer stability during deformation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The relief surface is positioned ahead of the necking surface to provide preemptive support to the container wall during the necking process. This beforehand cushioning prevents collapse and buckling before they can occur, enabling aggressive necking with greater diameter reduction while maintaining container stability and improving productivity without compromising reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Reliability

If conventional expansion dies are used, then the expansion process is straightforward, but frictional contact causes defects and coating damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoating integrity during expansionVSAvoidexpansion die structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The expansion die incorporates a textured surface in the expansion zone with specific surface roughness characteristics that reduce frictional contact between the die and container. This local modification in the contact zone minimizes coating damage and frictional defects while maintaining the overall structural integrity of the expansion die, thereby improving reliability without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Manufacturing precision

If multiple necking dies are used to achieve precise diameter control, then manufacturing precision improves, but the number of dies and process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediameter control accuracyVSAvoidnumber of necking dies
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The necking die combines multiple functions into a single integrated component: the polished necking surface provides precise diameter control through controlled deformation, while the non-polished relief surface provides structural support and prevents defects. This merging of functions into one die eliminates the need for multiple separate dies, achieving manufacturing precision without increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces the necking force required, enables greater diameter reduction and expansion without defects, and maintains the integrity of the container's coating, improving manufacturing efficiency and product quality.

Implementation Method 1

The land has a surface finish Ra ranging from about 2.032 × 10-4 to about 6.096 × 10-4 micrometers (about 80 to about 240 micro-inches), and the relief has a surface finish Ra ranging from about 3.176 × 10-3 to about 7.936 × 10-3 micrometers (about 125 to about 312 micro-inches)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction reduction through surface texturing: Friction

Implementation Method 2

a working surface of the necking die contacts a section of the sidewall and reduces a diameter of the section of the sidewall by at least 2% in a single stroke

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlastic deformation: Plasticity

Implementation Method 3

expansion dies with a progressively expanding portion and undercut, allows for aggressive necking and expansion while minimizing frictional contact and physical defects

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP3851223B1Shaped metal container
Publication Date: 2024.09.11 KAISER ALUMINUM WARRICK LLC
  • EP3851223B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3851223B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3851223B1 patent drawingFigure 2(a)

AI summary

A shaped rnetal container comprising less metal than prior art shaped metal containers while still able to handle sufficient axial load and undergo shaping processes, including necking, without wrinkling, buckling, collapsing or other physical defect is disclosed. Processes for shaping a metal container having a sidewall of variable thickness, wherein a portion of the sidewall having a variable thickness is shaped using a die or dies are also disclosed.