Metal Detector Transmit Coil Feedback Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional time-domain metal detectors face reduced sensitivity to metallic targets with short decay periods due to delayed receive signal sampling, which contaminates the signal with reactive components, limiting detection of targets with faster time constants.

Innovation Solution

A metal detector employing a repeating transmit signal cycle with a substantially half-sine waveform during non-zero transmit coil reactive voltage periods, ensuring a constant non-zero current through the coil, allowing for simultaneous processing of receive signals without reactive contamination.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If delayed receive signal sampling is used to avoid reactive component contamination, then receive signal accuracy is improved, but detection sensitivity to targets with short decay periods deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereceive signal accuracyVSAvoiddetection sensitivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback control by monitoring the transmit coil current and adjusting the transmit signal waveform in real-time. The controller uses feedback from current sensors to maintain the transmit coil current at a substantially constant value during the receive period, which eliminates reactive voltage drops and allows immediate signal processing without contamination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the waveform parameters of the repeating transmit signal cycle, specifically using a substantially half-sine waveform during the non-zero transmit coil reactive voltage period. This parameter change ensures that the current through the transmit coil remains substantially constant during the receive period, eliminating the need for delayed sampling while maintaining signal accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If receive signal processing is delayed to occur after back-emf decay, then reactive component contamination is reduced, but detection of targets with fast time constants deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal processing accuracyVSAvoiddetection response time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The controller continuously monitors the transmit coil current using feedback from sensors and dynamically adjusts the transmit signal waveform to maintain constant current during the receive period. This real-time feedback control eliminates reactive voltage drops, allowing immediate signal processing without the need for time delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent prepares the transmit coil current in advance by controlling it to be substantially constant before the receive period begins. The half-sine waveform is specifically designed to establish the desired current condition prior to signal sampling, eliminating the need for post-excitation delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If constant non-zero current is maintained through the transmit coil during receive period, then sensitivity to targets with short decay periods is improved, but transmit electronics complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection sensitivityVSAvoidtransmit electronics complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses feedback control circuits that monitor the transmit coil current and automatically adjust the transmit signal to maintain constant current. This feedback mechanism simplifies the overall control strategy compared to complex switching sequences, as the system self-regulates to achieve the desired current profile.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the waveform parameter from traditional rectangular or pulsed signals to a substantially half-sine waveform. This parameter change naturally produces the desired constant current effect during the receive period through the inductive characteristics of the transmit coil, reducing the need for complex switching control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Measurement precision

If half-sine waveform is used during non-zero reactive voltage period, then receive signal contamination is reduced, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal processing accuracyVSAvoidtransmit energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs periodic action by using a repeating transmit signal cycle with specific timing. The half-sine waveform is applied only during the non-zero reactive voltage period, while constant current is maintained during the receive period. This periodic structure optimizes the balance between signal quality and energy consumption by confining high-energy waveform activity to necessary intervals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent maintains continuous useful action by keeping the transmit coil current substantially constant throughout the receive period rather than switching it off. This continuous current flow eliminates reactive voltage drops and allows immediate signal processing, improving detection sensitivity while the periodic half-sine excitation ensures energy efficiency during non-measurement intervals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the detection of metallic targets with faster time constants by reducing signal contamination, improving sensitivity without compromising the accuracy of the receive signal processing.

Implementation Method 1

transmit electronics for generating a repeating transmit signal cycle... a transmit coil connected to the transmit electronics for receiving the repeating transmit signal cycle and generating a transmit magnetic field

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

a receive coil for receiving a receive magnetic field during the at least one receive period and providing a receive signal induced by the receive magnetic field

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 3

Eddy currents induced in metallic targets, such as small gold nuggets and fine gold chains

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEddy currents: Eddy Currents

Data Source

PatentUS9250348B2Transmit signal of a metal detector controlled by feedback loops
Publication Date: 2016.02.02 MINELAB ELECTRONICS
  • US9250348B2 patent drawing
  • US9250348B2 patent drawing
  • US9250348B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A metal detector has one or more feedback loops to control its repeating transmit signal cycle so that there is no reactive voltage drop across the transmit coil of the metal detector during at least one receive period of the metal detector.