Metal and Graphite Crucible Mold for Wear Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing silica crucible manufacturing process using graphite molds is complex, expensive, and prone to high wear due to rapid heating and cooling issues, leading to increased production costs and reduced throughput, as well as uneven gas flow causing additional wear and insulation that slows down the cooling process.

Innovation Solution

A metal container with a graphite insert and strategically positioned porous graphite plugs and bores that control gas flow, reducing wear on the graphite insert by minimizing high-speed gas flow and using a steel can to manage heat and facilitate efficient cooling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If graphite is used as the mold material, then it can be easily shaped and withstand heat, but it wears quickly and must be frequently replaced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of shapingVSAvoidwear resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The mold is divided into two segments: a graphite insert for shaping and a metal can for structural support. The graphite insert is segmented from the metal container, allowing each material to perform its optimal function - graphite for easy shaping and heat resistance, metal for durability and wear resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mold uses a composite structure combining graphite and metal materials. The graphite insert is placed within a metal can, creating a composite mold system that leverages the advantages of both materials: graphite's ease of machining and heat resistance, and metal's strength and wear resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Ease of manufacture

If graphite mold is used, then it can be shaped easily, but it takes longer to cool down than metal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of shapingVSAvoidcooling time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The mold is segmented into graphite insert and metal can, allowing the metal can to serve as a heat sink for faster cooling while the graphite insert maintains its shaping advantages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The metal can acts as an intermediary thermal management system, facilitating heat transfer from the graphite insert to the environment, thereby reducing cooling time while the graphite insert continues to provide easy shaping capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If air channels are created in the graphite mold, then gas can be drawn through to prevent bubbles, but it creates strong air flow that causes wear and forms channels on the mold surface

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebubble preventionVSAvoidgraphite wear
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The air channels are extracted from the graphite insert and relocated to the metal can. This removes the harmful high-velocity gas flow impact from the graphite mold surface while maintaining the bubble prevention function through the metal can's air channels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The metal can serves as an intermediary structure that houses the air channels, allowing gas flow to occur within the metal rather than directly impacting the graphite insert surface, thereby preventing wear while maintaining bubble removal functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration reduces wear on the graphite insert, enhances cooling efficiency, and maintains production throughput while minimizing the need for frequent mold replacements, thereby lowering production costs and improving crucible manufacturing efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

gas is drawn through the silica and into the air channels in the graphite mold by a vacuum pump

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas flow through porous material: Permeation

Implementation Method 2

gas is drawn through the silica and into the air channels in the graphite mold by a vacuum pump

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum: Vacuum

Implementation Method 3

power in the range of 300 KVA to 1200 KVA is applied, thus creating ball of plasma gas. The heat so generated fuses the silica

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlasma: Plasma

Implementation Method 4

power in the range of 300 KVA to 1200 KVA is applied, thus creating ball of plasma gas. The heat so generated fuses the silica

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Implementation Method 5

a steel can to manage heat and facilitate efficient cooling

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Data Source

PatentUS9216923B2Metal and graphite mold and method of making a crucible
Publication Date: 2015.12.22 SHIN ETABU QUARTZ PRODS
  • US9216923B2 patent drawing
  • US9216923B2 patent drawing
  • US9216923B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A mold for making a fused silica crucible includes a cylindrical can having an interior bore. A graphite insert is received in the bore and has an upper surface adapted to form the lower surface of the crucible while the interior bore of the can forms the side wall of the crucible. Silica grain is deposited in the mold while it rotates. Bores formed in the can above the insert and in the insert draw air through the silica during fusion.