Metal Oxide Block Compaction Without Binders

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for recycling metal oxide fines, such as pelletization and briquetting, are inefficient due to the need for additives, high costs, and the production of products with low mechanical strength and high waste generation, which complicates handling and storage.

Innovation Solution

A process using a rotary punch press to compact metal oxide particles into tablets with specific porosity and density characteristics, eliminating the need for binders and additives, and achieving higher mechanical strength and reduced waste.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of stationary object

If pelletization or briquetting is used to compact metal oxide fines, then the product density is improved, but the mechanical strength deteriorates due to macrodefects and friability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct densityVSAvoidmechanical strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of stationary objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by controlling particle size distribution (D10<D50<D90 ratios), compaction pressure (200-800 MPa), and moisture content (5-15%) to achieve optimal packing density and mechanical strength without binders. This resolves the contradiction by finding the right parameter window where both density and strength are maximized.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by creating a specific particle size distribution profile where fine particles fill voids between larger particles. The D10-D50-D90 ratio control ensures local optimization of particle packing in different regions of the compact, eliminating macrodefects while maintaining high density and strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If additives and binders are used in pelletization or briquetting, then the mechanical strength is improved, but the purity and recyclability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical strengthVSAvoidpurity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the extraction principle by completely removing additives and binders from the compaction process. It achieves this by using only physical compaction of metal oxide particles with controlled size distribution, thereby maintaining 100% purity and full recyclability while still obtaining adequate mechanical strength through optimized particle packing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies self-service by allowing the metal oxide particles themselves to provide the binding function through their own physical and mechanical properties. The controlled particle size distribution enables particles to interlock and pack densely without external binders, making the system self-sufficient and preserving material purity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If pelletization or briquetting is used, then the handling and storage is improved, but the waste generation increases due to process complexity and macrodefects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling and storageVSAvoidwaste generation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the typically harmful effect of particle size variation into a benefit. Instead of requiring uniform particle sizes (which would waste material in sorting), it uses the size variation to create interlocking structures that improve mechanical strength and reduce macrodefects, thereby reducing waste while improving handling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the compacted product into controlled particle size ranges (D10-D50-D90) before compaction. This segmentation allows optimized packing of different size fractions, reducing void spaces and macrodefects, which minimizes waste generation while maintaining handleability of the final product.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Strength

If high compaction pressure is applied to eliminate macrodefects, then the mechanical strength is improved, but the energy consumption and equipment complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical strengthVSAvoidequipment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-classifying particles into specific size ranges (D10-D50-D90 ratios) before compaction. This preliminary sorting optimizes particle packing efficiency, allowing the use of moderate compaction pressures (200-800 MPa) rather than extremely high pressures, thereby reducing equipment complexity while still eliminating macrodefects and achieving high strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process produces compacted tablets with improved mechanical strength, reduced porosity, and enhanced handling and storage capabilities, allowing for efficient recycling and industrial-scale reuse of metal oxides without the drawbacks of existing methods.

Implementation Method 1

The process uses a rotary punch press to compact metal oxide particles into tablets with specific porosity and density characteristics

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompaction pressure: Compression

Data Source

PatentEP3134557B1Compact metal oxide block, and related manufacturing method
Publication Date: 2020.01.01 EUROTAB SA
  • EP3134557B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3134557B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3134557B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

The invention relates to a composition comprising a mixture of one or more metal oxides having the formula MxOyUi, in which M is a metal atom selected from among iron, aluminum, titanium, manganese, zinc, copper, zirconium, nickel, and lead, O is an oxygen atom, U is an impurity, and x, y, and i are mole fractions of 0 to 1, with x + y &gt; 80%. Said composition takes the form of a three-dimensional compact block having an apparent density no lower than 2, an apparent porosity of 3% to 40%, and a diametric breaking strength no lower than 250 kPa. The invention also relates to a method for manufacturing a compact block made of one or more metal oxides.