Carbon-Free Metal Oxide Cathode for Lithium-Air Batteries

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Lithium-air batteries face issues with carbon-based cathodes due to oxidation reactions and reduced charging efficiency, leading to decreased battery capacity and electrolyte degradation, necessitating a carbon-free, conductive, and inexpensive cathode solution.

Innovation Solution

A porous conductive metal oxide cathode is developed, comprising a metal foil with deposited porous conductive metal oxide particles, fabricated using a sol-gel process involving polystyrene beads and a metal oxide precursor, minimizing oxidizable carbon content and optimizing porosity for efficient lithium peroxide deposition.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If carbon-based cathodes are used in lithium-air batteries, then the cathode provides good conductivity and porosity, but oxidation reactions occur leading to reduced charging efficiency and electrolyte degradation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecharging efficiencyVSAvoidoxidation reactions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes carbon materials from the cathode structure entirely, extracting the harmful oxidizable component while replacing it with metal oxide particles that provide the necessary conductivity and porosity without undergoing oxidation reactions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the chemical composition parameter of the cathode from carbon-based to metal oxide-based materials, fundamentally altering the chemical stability parameter to resist oxidation while maintaining electrical conductivity through appropriate metal oxide selection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Duration of action of stationary object

If carbon-based cathodes are used, then the cathode structure is simple and inexpensive, but battery capacity decreases and electrolyte degradation occurs over repeated cycles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery cycle lifeVSAvoidelectrolyte degradation
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

By removing carbon materials that are responsible for oxidation reactions, the patent eliminates the source of electrolyte degradation, thereby extending battery cycle life and preventing substance loss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the harmful oxidation reactions into a beneficial stable chemical environment where metal oxide particles resist oxidation, protecting the electrolyte from degradation and maintaining battery performance over extended cycles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If nanoporous gold is used as a carbon-free alternative, then oxidation resistance is improved, but manufacturing cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoxidation resistanceVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs inexpensive metal oxide particles (such as manganese oxide, iron oxide, or zinc oxide) that can be obtained through conventional processing methods, replacing expensive nanoporous gold while achieving comparable oxidation resistance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite cathode structure combining metal oxide particles with conductive additives and binders, achieving both oxidation resistance and electrical conductivity at low cost through material composition rather than relying on expensive pure metal structures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Reliability

If a carbon-free metal oxide cathode is used, then oxidation resistance and charging efficiency are improved, but electrical conductivity may be reduced compared to carbon-based cathodes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoxidation resistanceVSAvoidelectrical conductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent formulates a composite cathode material where metal oxide particles are combined with conductive components (such as conductive polymers or metal powders) to maintain electrical conductivity while the metal oxide matrix provides oxidation resistance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different material properties to different regions of the cathode structure, with metal oxide particles providing oxidation resistance in the bulk and conductive additives providing electrical pathways at the particle interfaces and throughout the matrix

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The carbon-free cathode enhances charging efficiency and prevents electrolyte degradation, maintaining battery performance and capacity over repeated charge/discharge cycles while reducing internal resistance.

Implementation Method 1

combining the dispersion with a metal oxide precursor; forming a sol-gel by gelation; and depositing the sol-gel on a perforated metal foil or removable support

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSol-gel: Sol

Implementation Method 2

a porous conductive metal oxide particle... The porous material may be electrically and/or ionically conductive

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIonic conduction: Conduction (electrical)

Implementation Method 3

Both electrodes contain active materials that react with lithium reversibly. During charging, there is generation of electrons at the positive electrode and consumption of an equal amount of electrons at the negative electrode

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrochemical reaction: Redox Reactions

Data Source

PatentEP3398221B1Metal oxide cathode
Publication Date: 2021.07.21 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • EP3398221B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3398221B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3398221B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An essentially carbon-free cathode for a lithium/air secondary battery and methods for making are provided. The cathode includes a hollow porous conductive metal oxide particle such as indium tin oxide, an optional functional layer, and an electrically conductive binder.