Metal Oxide Particle Fuel Conversion System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing carbonaceous fuel conversion technologies are either capital intensive, have low efficiencies, or both, especially when CO2 regulation is mandatory, and they often fail to produce pure energy carriers like hydrogen and electricity efficiently with high conversion rates and low emissions.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a first reactor with ceramic composite particles that reduce metal oxides using carbonaceous fuels, followed by a second reactor for partial oxidation to produce hydrogen and a third reactor for metal oxide regeneration, optionally using CO2 and steam, which enhances energy conversion efficiency and reduces the need for an Air Separation Unit.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If conventional fuel conversion technologies (gasification or ultra-supercritical pulverized coal combustion) are used, then energy conversion is achieved, but capital costs are high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy conversionVSAvoidcapital costs
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The fuel conversion process is divided into three separate reactors (reducer, oxidizer, combustor), each performing a specific function. This segmentation allows for optimized operation of each unit and eliminates the need for expensive Air Separation Units required by conventional single-stage systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Metal oxide particles serve as intermediaries that transfer oxygen from air to fuel indirectly. The metal oxide is reduced in the first reactor, then regenerated in the second reactor, acting as a carrier that enables fuel conversion without direct contact with air, thereby eliminating the need for complex air separation equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Power

If conventional fuel conversion technologies are used, then energy conversion is achieved, but conversion efficiency is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy conversionVSAvoidconversion efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system operates with continuous circulation of metal oxide particles between reactors, maintaining uninterrupted fuel conversion. The counter-current flow arrangement ensures continuous heat and mass transfer, maximizing conversion efficiency without idle periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The metal oxide undergoes periodic reduction and regeneration cycles, alternating between oxygen-deficient and oxygen-rich states. This periodic transformation enables sustained high-efficiency fuel conversion by maintaining optimal chemical potential differences throughout the process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Object-affected harmful factors

If CO2 regulation is mandatory, then emissions control is achieved, but both capital costs and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemissions controlVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The Air Separation Unit, which is complex and capital-intensive in conventional systems, is completely removed. The metal oxide particle circulation system replaces it, simplifying the overall plant configuration while maintaining CO2 regulation capability through controlled oxidation reactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The CO2 that would normally be a harmful emission is converted into a useful reactant in the oxidizer reactor, where it participates in the regeneration of metal oxide particles. This transforms a waste product into a valuable chemical intermediate, reducing emissions while simplifying the system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

4Productivity

If fluidized bed is used in steam-iron process, then fuel conversion is achieved, but gas conversion is incomplete and pure gas stream cannot be produced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel conversionVSAvoidgas purity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The fuel conversion process is divided into three separate reactors (reducer, oxidizer, combustor), each performing a specific function. This segmentation allows for optimized operation of each unit and eliminates the need for expensive Air Separation Units required by conventional single-stage systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using fluidized bed combustion where fuel burns directly with air, the system inverts the approach by using metal oxide particles to transfer oxygen to fuel in a controlled reduction-oxidation cycle. This indirect oxygen transfer enables complete fuel conversion and produces pure gas streams without the mixing problems of direct combustion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system achieves high efficiency in converting carbonaceous fuels to carbon-free energy carriers like hydrogen and heat, with over 90% fuel conversion and 65-80% energy conversion efficiency, while minimizing emissions and capital costs by eliminating or reducing the need for an Air Separation Unit.

Implementation Method 1

Reduction-Oxidation (redox) reactions, with the presence of one or more chemical intermediates, are generally utilized to convert the carbonaceous fuels.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReduction-Oxidation (redox) reactions: Redox Reactions

Implementation Method 2

oxidizing the reduced metal or metal oxide to produce hydrogen and a metal oxide having a higher oxidation state

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 3

regenerate the at least one metal oxide by oxidizing the metal oxide intermediate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Data Source

PatentEP2406545B1Conversion of carbonaceous fuels into carbon free energy carriers
Publication Date: 2019.05.29 THE OHIO STATES UNIV
  • EP2406545B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2A
  • EP2406545B1 patent drawingFigure 2B~2C
  • EP2406545B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4B

AI summary

A system for converting fuel is provided and includes a first reactor comprising a plurality of ceramic composite particles, the ceramic composite particles comprising at least one metal oxide disposed on a support, wherein the first reactor is configured to reduce the at least one metal oxide with a fuel to produce a reduced metal or a reduced metal oxide; a second reactor configured to oxidize at least a portion of the reduced metal or reduced metal oxide from the said first reactor to produce a metal oxide intermediate; a source of air; and a third reactor communicating with said source of air and configured to regenerate the at least one metal oxide from the remaining portion of the solids discharged from the said first reactor and the solids discharged from the said second reactor by oxidizing the metal oxide intermediate.