Metal-Plastic Lens Casing for Submicron Fit and Ridge Engagement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing metal casings for outdoor lenses in vehicles and sports cameras suffer from machining accuracy issues, high eccentricity, and inability to fit with bumpy ridge structures, while plastic casings lack load-carrying performance and reliability.

Innovation Solution

A dual-casing design comprising a metal outer casing and a softer plastic inner casing with complementary concave-convex structures and a rough engaging section, allowing precise fitting and improved stability, reducing machining requirements and enhancing engagement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a metal casing is used for outdoor lenses, then load-carrying performance and reliability are improved, but machining accuracy and fit level deteriorate due to high eccentricity and size control issues

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoidfit level
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The casing is divided into an outer metal casing and an inner plastic casing. The outer metal casing provides structural strength and reliability, while the inner plastic casing ensures precise fitting with the lens group. This segmentation allows each material to fulfill its optimal function without the drawbacks of using a single material.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses a composite structure combining metal and plastic materials. The metal outer casing offers high strength and reliability for harsh environments, while the plastic inner casing provides excellent machining accuracy and fit control (fit level less than 1 μm), effectively resolving the contradiction between reliability and manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If a metal casing is used, then strength and durability are improved, but adaptability to different fitting structures deteriorates as it can only match stacked outer diameter structures

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestrengthVSAvoidadaptability to fitting structures
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The inner plastic casing is designed with a rough part on its outer surface that can adapt to different fitting structures (both stacked outer diameter and bumpy ridge types). This local adaptation allows the overall strong metal casing to work with various lens fitting structures, enhancing versatility without compromising strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Manufacturing precision

If a plastic casing is used, then adaptability and fit level are improved, but load-carrying performance and reliability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefit levelVSAvoidload-carrying performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The casing is segmented into functional zones: the outer metal casing handles mechanical strength and load-bearing, while the inner plastic casing handles precision fitting and adaptability. This functional segmentation allows each material to excel at its designated task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

By combining metal and plastic in a composite casing structure, the invention achieves both high strength (from metal) and excellent fit level with adaptability to various fitting structures (from plastic), resolving the contradiction between strength and manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Manufacturing precision

If metal casing machining accuracy is improved, then fit level is improved, but manufacturing complexity and proofing cycle lengthen due to high blackening accuracy requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefit levelVSAvoidproofing phase cycle
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The inner plastic casing acts as a precision interface component that can be manufactured with high accuracy through molding rather than complex machining and blackening processes. This reduces the proofing cycle and manufacturing complexity while maintaining the required fit level, as plastic molding is generally simpler and faster than precision metal machining and surface treatment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Data Source

PatentUS12386140B2Casing and lens
Publication Date: 2025.08.12 AAC OPTICS(NANNING)TECH LTD
  • US12386140B2 patent drawing
  • US12386140B2 patent drawing
  • US12386140B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides a casing and a lens and relates to the technical field of optical equipment. The casing includes an outer casing provided with an accommodating hole and an inner casing accommodated in the outer casing and provided with a mounting hole. The outer casing is made of metal material, and a hardness of the inner casing is lower than a hardness of the outer casing, thereby the outer casing can meet the metal shape requirements of the lens. The relatively soft inner casing can solve the problem that a metal material cannot be tightly fitted with the lens group. The casing not only has advantages of metal profiles, but also can take a fitting structure with stacked outer diameters and a bumpy ridge fitting structure into account due to providing the relatively soft inner casing inside, which is more beneficial for lenses with high performance requirements.