3D Metal Printer Thermal Error Compensation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Three-dimensional object printers using liquid metal ejectors face geometric and material property deviations due to lack of leveling devices, leading to vertical and lateral errors, inconsistent drop ejection, and thermal influences, which can result in unfit objects and require halting the manufacturing process or scrapping the part.

Innovation Solution

The method involves generating thermal and dimensional image data to detect adverse thermal and geometric conditions, comparing them to predetermined thresholds, and modifying machine-ready instructions to compensate for errors in real-time without halting the process, using thermal and dimensional image data to adjust the operation of the 3D metal object manufacturing system.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If liquid metal ejectors are used to form successive layers without a leveling device, then the additive manufacturing process can be simplified, but vertical errors accumulate and produce geometric deviations that make the object unfit for its purpose

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveleveling deviceVSAvoidvertical error accumulation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements real-time feedback by monitoring the thermal state of the built part and detecting geometric deviations as they occur during manufacturing. This feedback loop enables dynamic compensation of vertical errors without requiring mechanical leveling devices, resolving the contradiction between device simplicity and manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes process parameters dynamically by adjusting ejection conditions (such as electromagnetic field strength, drop spacing, and timing) based on detected thermal and geometric conditions. This allows compensation for vertical errors through parameter modulation rather than mechanical intervention, maintaining both simplicity and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If the manufacturing process is halted to detect and correct geometric errors, then object quality can be maintained, but productivity is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject qualityVSAvoidmanufacturing continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains continuous manufacturing operation by implementing real-time detection and compensation mechanisms that correct geometric errors on-the-fly. The additive manufacturing process continues uninterrupted while the controller dynamically adjusts ejection parameters to compensate for deviations, eliminating the need to halt production for quality control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-correction by automatically detecting geometric deviations and adjusting its own operating parameters to compensate for errors. This self-service capability allows the system to maintain object quality while continuing operation, as the manufacturing process corrects its own deviations without external intervention or process interruption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If drop ejection frequency is increased to improve productivity, then manufacturing speed increases, but drop-to-drop interaction and thermal influences cause geometric errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing speedVSAvoidgeometric error
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts drop ejection frequency and spacing based on real-time thermal monitoring and geometric feedback. Rather than maintaining a fixed high-speed ejection rate, the controller modulates parameters adaptively to account for thermal accumulation and drop interaction effects, enabling high productivity while maintaining precision through dynamic parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for continuous manufacturing by compensating for thermal and geometric discrepancies, ensuring accurate object formation and maintaining the quality of the printed part without scrapping, by adjusting drop spacing and thermal conditions dynamically.

Implementation Method 1

An electrical current is passed through the conductor to produce an electromagnetic field that causes the meniscus of the liquid metal at a nozzle of the chamber to separate from the liquid metal within the chamber and be propelled from the nozzle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic propulsion: Electromagnetic Propulsion

Data Source

PatentUS11565475B2Method and system for operating a metal drop ejecting three-dimensional (3D) object printer to compensate for geometric variations that occur during an additive manufacturing process
Publication Date: 2023.01.31 ADDITIVE TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • US11565475B2 patent drawing
  • US11565475B2 patent drawing
  • US11565475B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method operates a three-dimensional (3D) metal object manufacturing system to compensate for errors that occur during object formation. In the method, thermal image data and dimensional image data of a metal object being formed by the 3D metal object manufacturing system is generated prior to completion of the metal object. Thermal conditions are identified from these data and compared to predetermined ranges corresponding to the identified thermal conditions to identify one or more errors. For identified errors outside a corresponding predetermined difference range, the method performs an error compensation technique. The error compensation includes modification of a surface data model, modification of machine-ready instructions, or operation of a subtractive device.