Metal-Supported Skeletal Catalyst for Steam Methane Reforming

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional catalysts face challenges in achieving high geometric surface area-to-volume ratios and maintaining activity under severe conditions due to mass and heat transfer limitations, as well as issues with washcoat uniformity and adhesion, leading to premature deactivation and hot spots.

Innovation Solution

A method for producing metal-supported thin-layer skeletal catalyst structures without an intermediate washcoat layer, involving a slurry of metal powders, heat treatment, leaching, and chelating acid baths to create interdiffused alloy surfaces that are then formed into high-surface-area structures with intrinsic oxidic support layers for enhanced catalytic activity and stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If an intermediate washcoat layer is applied to the metal substrate, then the catalytic agents can be distributed on the support surface, but the coating becomes susceptible to delamination and weak adhesion under aggressive conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoating adhesionVSAvoidmulti-layer structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention removes the intermediate washcoat layer from the catalyst structure, allowing catalytic agents to be applied directly to the metal substrate. This eliminates the delamination risk associated with multi-layer structures while maintaining catalytic functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention combines the functions of the washcoat layer and catalytic agent layer into a single integrated structure. The catalytic agents are applied directly to the metal substrate, merging the support function and catalytic function into one unified system that avoids interfacial adhesion problems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Ease of manufacture

If the catalyst coating is applied before physical forming of the scaffold, then the structure can be manipulated, but the coating suffers damage from mechanical processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephysical manipulationVSAvoidcoating integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention inverts the conventional sequence by applying the catalytic agents directly to the metal substrate without a protective washcoat layer, then performing physical forming operations. The direct bonding of catalytic agents to the substrate allows the structure to be manipulated and formed into desired shapes without coating damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Productivity

If traditional heterogeneous catalysts are operated in compact reactor configurations at higher space velocities, then productivity increases, but mass and heat transfer limitations attenuate maximum catalyst activity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespace velocityVSAvoidcatalyst activity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses metal foam substrates with controlled pore structures that enable high surface area-to-volume ratios while maintaining open channels for efficient mass and heat transfer. This porous architecture allows high space velocities to be achieved without the transfer limitations that plague traditional dense catalyst structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from traditional two-dimensional planar catalyst surfaces to three-dimensional metal foam structures with hierarchical porosity. This dimensional transformation provides both high surface area for catalysis and interconnected pathways for rapid mass and heat transfer, enabling high productivity without activity attenuation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Productivity

If the washcoat layer is made thin to reduce resistance, then mass and heat transfer improve, but the coating becomes more susceptible to damage from aggressive conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemass and heat transferVSAvoidcoating durability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention eliminates the washcoat layer entirely, removing the inherent weakness of thin coatings under aggressive conditions. By applying catalytic agents directly to the metal substrate, the system achieves both high mass and heat transfer efficiency and robust durability without the compromise required by thin washcoat designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method results in catalysts with increased conversion per geometric area and resistance to activity loss, achieving uniformity and stability under severe conditions, suitable for applications like steam methane reforming and hydrodeoxygenation.

Implementation Method 1

heat treatment... whereby at least one of the one or more metal powders melts and interdiffuses into the surface of the metal substrate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting: Melting

Implementation Method 2

metal powders melts and interdiffuses into the surface of the metal substrate forming an alloy or intermetallic that firmly binds the coating to the metal substrate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInterdiffusion: Diffusion

Implementation Method 3

leaching the coated metal substrate... in a caustic solution

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLeaching: Purification

Implementation Method 4

bathing the coated metal substrate... in a chelating acid solution... and passivating the coated metal substrate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPassivation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 5

further treated in an oxidation step to generate adherent oxide layers that provide intrinsic support surfaces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Data Source

PatentUS10532346B2Method for producing a metal-supported catalyst and catalyst substrate
Publication Date: 2020.01.14 ALLOY SURFACES CO INC
  • US10532346B2 patent drawing
  • US10532346B2 patent drawing
  • US10532346B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to methods for producing metal-supported thin layer skeletal catalyst structures, to methods for producing catalyst support structures without separately applying an intermediate washcoat layer, and to novel catalyst compositions produced by these methods. Catalyst precursors may be interdiffused with the underlying metal support then activated to create catalytically active skeletal alloy surfaces. The resulting metal-anchored skeletal layers provide increased conversion per geometric area compared to conversions from other types of supported alloy catalysts of similar bulk compositions, and provide resistance to activity loss when used under severe on-stream conditions. Particular compositions of the metal-supported skeletal catalyst alloy structures can be used for conventional steam methane reforming to produce syngas from natural gas and steam, for hydrodeoxygenation of pyrolysis bio-oils, and for other metal-catalyzed reactions inter alia.