Metal Surface Cleanliness Verification via Electrical Resistance Measurement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for cleaning metal surfaces in industrial plants, such as chemical and petrochemical plants, are inefficient and lack a reliable means to ensure complete cleaning, often resulting in incomplete cleaning, process downtime, and increased maintenance costs due to the inability to visually inspect all areas effectively.

Innovation Solution

A method involving high-pressure water jets for cleaning, followed by measuring the electrical resistance of the metal surfaces using a resistance meter with a probing tip and counter tip, where the electrical resistance value is compared to a predetermined threshold to ensure sufficient cleaning, allowing for precise assessment of cleaning completeness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If visual inspection methods are used to assess cleaning results, then the inspection process is simple and quick, but the measurement precision and reliability are insufficient for complex plant designs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection simplicityVSAvoidcleaning assessment accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces visual inspection methods with electrical resistance measurement. A resistance meter with probing tips measures the electrical resistance of the metal surface, which changes based on the presence of contaminant layers. This substitution provides objective, quantitative data for cleaning assessment, eliminating the subjectivity and limitations of visual inspection while maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If elaborate analytical methods are used to determine cleaning degree, then the measurement precision improves, but the device complexity and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning assessment accuracyVSAvoidinspection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes complex analytical methods with a simple electrical resistance measurement system. The resistance meter uses basic electrical principles to detect contaminant layers through changes in surface resistance, providing accurate cleaning assessment without requiring elaborate equipment or complex procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes the change in electrical resistance parameter as an indicator of cleaning status. By measuring resistance at different stages of cleaning and comparing to reference values, the system provides precise cleaning assessment through a single, easily measurable physical parameter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Power

If high-pressure water jets are used for cleaning, then the cleaning power increases, but the reliability of achieving sufficient cleanliness cannot be guaranteed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning capabilityVSAvoidcleaning effectiveness assurance
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where electrical resistance measurements are taken during and after cleaning operations. The measured resistance values provide real-time feedback on cleaning effectiveness, allowing operators to adjust cleaning parameters or repeat cleaning until the desired resistance threshold is achieved, thereby guaranteeing cleaning reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces subjective visual assessment of cleaning effectiveness with objective electrical resistance measurement. This substitution provides a reliable, quantifiable criterion for determining when cleaning is sufficient, eliminating the uncertainty associated with visual inspection alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method ensures reliable and efficient cleaning of metal surfaces, reducing maintenance costs and extending the operational time of industrial plant components by providing a quick and precise means to verify the cleanliness of metal surfaces, even in inaccessible areas.

Implementation Method 1

measuring the electrical resistance R A1 of the surface of the metal component at at least one point of the cleaned area by at least one resistance meter

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical Resistance: Electrical Resistance

Implementation Method 2

the counter tip is a punctual tip held by a magnet to a surface of the metal component of the industrial plant

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetism: Magnetism

Data Source

PatentEP3351312B1Method for inspecting cleanliness level of a metal surface of a metal compound in an industrial plant by means of electrical resistance measurement
Publication Date: 2022.08.24 BASELL POLYOLEFINE GMBH
  • EP3351312B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3351312B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

A method for cleaning a metal surface of a metal component of an industrial plant is disclosed comprising measuring the electrical resistance RA1 of a metal component over a cleaned area of the metal surface with a resistance meter, comparing the electrical resistance RA1 measured with a pre-determined electrical resistance value RDET, assessing whether RA1 is greater, smaller or equal to RDET, and repeating cleaning if the electrical resistance RA1 measured is greater than RDET, or terminating cleaning of the surface area of the metal component if RA1 is smaller than or identical to RDET.