Metallic Binders for Reactive Fragment Density and Integrity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional reactive fragments face challenges with ignition at velocities less than 4000 ft/s, penetration due to low density, and structural integrity issues, particularly with polymeric matrix materials.

Innovation Solution

A reactive fragment comprising energetic material dispersed in a metallic binder material, with the binder material formed from metals like bismuth, lead, or aluminum, and optionally reinforced with organic or inorganic additives, to enhance density and structural integrity, allowing for tailored ballistic and thermal characteristics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If polymeric matrix materials are used in reactive fragments, then ease of manufacture is improved, but density and structural integrity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoiddensity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies composite materials by combining polymeric matrix materials with metallic particles (such as aluminum, magnesium, or titanium) to create a reactive fragment composition that achieves both ease of manufacture and high density. The metallic particles are dispersed within the polymeric matrix, creating a composite structure that leverages the processing advantages of polymers while gaining the density and structural properties of metals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Ease of manufacture

If polymeric matrix materials are used in reactive fragments, then ease of manufacture is improved, but structural integrity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidstructural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The composite structure of polymeric matrix with dispersed metallic particles provides both ease of manufacture and enhanced structural integrity. The metallic particles act as reinforcement within the polymeric matrix, improving the overall strength and structural integrity of the reactive fragment while maintaining the manufacturing advantages of the polymeric binder.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Force

If reactive fragments are designed for high penetration, then penetration capability is improved, but ignition reliability at lower velocities deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepenetration capabilityVSAvoidignition reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by carefully controlling the particle size distribution, composition ratios, and physical state of the reactive materials to enable reliable ignition at lower impact velocities while maintaining high penetration capability. By adjusting parameters such as the size of metallic particles and the composition of the polymeric matrix, the fragment can ignite effectively at velocities below 4000 ft/s without sacrificing penetration performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The reactive fragment achieves improved control over ballistic, thermal, and structural characteristics, enabling ignition at lower velocities, enhanced penetration, and increased survivability, with tailored energy release to maximize destructive effects on targets.

Implementation Method 1

since the above-mentioned reactive fragments are based on organic or polymeric matrix materials, which have a density less than that of most targets, i.e., steel, difficulties may arise with respect to the penetration capabilities of the fragment

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDensity:

Implementation Method 2

Upon impact with the target reactive fragments release additional chemical or thermal energy thereby enhancing damage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectExothermic reaction: Exothermic Reaction

Implementation Method 3

the released chemical energy can be transferred to the surroundings thermally through radiant, conductive, and/or convective heat transfer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal radiation: Thermal Radiation

Implementation Method 4

The reactive fragment employs both kinetic energy transfer of the accelerated fragment into the target as well as the release chemical energy stored by the fragment

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectKinetic energy transfer:

Implementation Method 5

the released chemical energy can be transferred to the surroundings thermally through radiant, conductive, and/or convective heat transfer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Data Source

PatentUS8746145B2Structural metallic binders for reactive fragmentation weapons
Publication Date: 2014.06.10 LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
  • US8746145B2 patent drawing
  • US8746145B2 patent drawing
  • US8746145B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A munition is described including a reactive fragment having an energetic material dispersed in a metallic binder material. A method is also described including forming a energetic material; combining the energetic material with a metallic binder material to form a mixture; and shaping the mixture to form a reactive fragment. The munition may be in the form of a warhead, and the reactive fragment may be contained within a casing of the warhead.