Metallic Coating Control for Rough Surface Profile Compensation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing metallic coating methods struggle to maintain a desired surface profile on workpieces with macroscopically rough structures, leading to uneven coatings and increased manufacturing effort and costs.

Innovation Solution

A method and system where the coating process is controlled by a device that applies more material in areas of depth and less in areas of height, using laser build-up welding, allowing for precise application of metal powder and laser power to achieve a defined surface profile, and optionally using multiple application devices for simultaneous coating of both sides of disk-shaped workpieces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional coating methods are used on workpieces with macroscopically rough surfaces, then the coating process is simple, but the surface profile of the coated workpiece becomes uneven and the original roughness is preserved or amplified

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface profile uniformityVSAvoidcoating control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The surface structure is recorded by a measuring device before the coating process begins. This preliminary measurement allows the control device to plan and execute differentiated material application in advance, compensating for surface irregularities before they affect the final coating quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The control device applies coating material with locally differentiated thickness based on the measured surface structure. Areas with depths receive more material while areas with heights receive less material, creating a uniformly flat surface profile across the entire coated workpiece.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If uniform coating material application is used, then the coating process is efficient and simple, but material is wasted on high areas and insufficient material is applied to low areas

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface flatnessVSAvoidcoating material consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The control device regulates the coating material application locally based on the measured surface structure. More material is applied to areas with depths and less material to areas with heights, achieving uniform surface flatness while optimizing material consumption and avoiding waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The control device uses feedback from the measuring device's surface structure data to dynamically adjust the coating material application. This closed-loop control ensures that material is distributed precisely where needed, reducing overall consumption while achieving the desired surface quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If high coating accuracy is applied to workpieces with rough surfaces, then the desired surface profile can be achieved, but the manufacturing effort and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoating thickness controlVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The surface structure is measured and recorded before coating, allowing the system to plan the differentiated material application in advance. This preliminary action enables high coating accuracy to be achieved through automated control rather than manual intervention, maintaining ease of manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The manual or simple mechanical coating process is replaced with an automated system that uses optical measurement and electronic control to regulate material application. This substitution achieves high precision coating thickness control while maintaining manufacturing efficiency through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables efficient compensation of surface dimensional fluctuations, reduces material consumption, and minimizes post-processing effort, resulting in a robust, stable, and cost-effective coating with a desired surface profile.

Implementation Method 1

metal powder is applied to a point on the workpiece which is to be coated by means of an application device and the applied metal powder is locally melted by means of a laser, with formation of the coating

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser: Laser

Implementation Method 2

the applied metal powder is locally melted by means of a laser, with formation of the coating

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting: Melting

Data Source

PatentEP3798330B1Method and installation for metallic coating
Publication Date: 2022.08.31 STURM MASCH & ANLAGENBAU GMBH
  • EP3798330B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3798330B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3798330B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a method and a system for metallically coating at least one surface (6) of a workpiece (5), in which, prior to coating, a surface structure with heights and depths of the surface to be coated is detected by means of a measuring device (42), the coating is carried out by means of at least one application device which is moved relative to the surface (6) and thereby coating material is applied, and the application device is controlled by a control device depending on the detected surface structure, wherein more material is applied in the area of ​​depths and less material in the area of ​​heights.