Metallic Coating Thickness Control for Cost-Effective Corrosion Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for applying metal or metal alloy coatings lack efficiency in achieving the desired thickness and corrosion resistance, particularly when using high corrosion-resistant materials like icosahedral phase (I-phase) Al alloys, which are costly and require precise control of grain structure.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a sacrificial deposition rod formed using Shear Assisted Processing and Extrusion (ShAPE) technology, combined with Friction Surface Additive Manufacturing, where the rod is machined to precise thickness using a milling machine controlled by a processor to apply and adjust the coating thickness, allowing for cost-effective application of high corrosion-resistant coatings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a coating is formed from high corrosion-resistant metal alloy materials, then corrosion resistance is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrosion resistanceVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies high corrosion-resistant material only to the surface coating layer rather than the entire component. The base material can be less expensive while the expensive corrosion-resistant alloy is confined to a thin surface layer (typically 0.5-5 micrometers), achieving corrosion protection where needed without the full cost of using expensive alloy throughout the entire part.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the material state through severe plastic deformation and shear-assisted processing, changing the microstructure and properties of the coating material in place. This allows the use of materials that would be difficult to work with in traditional forms, enabling cost-effective application of high-performance alloys through processes like ShAPE (Shear-Assisted Processing and Extrusion).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If precise control of grain structure is required for high corrosion-resistant materials, then corrosion resistance is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrosion resistanceVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional complex mechanical processing methods with shear-assisted processing and extrusion techniques. The ShAPE process uses controlled shear forces to achieve precise grain structure control and material densification without requiring complex multi-step mechanical working, reducing manufacturing complexity while maintaining microstructural control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses shear-assisted processing to fundamentally change the material's microstructural parameters through controlled plastic deformation. This creates a refined grain structure with improved corrosion resistance without requiring the complex heat treatment and multi-stage processing that would otherwise be needed to achieve similar microstructural control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enables the efficient application of high corrosion-resistant coatings with precise thickness control, reducing material waste and manufacturing costs while maintaining the corrosion-resistant properties of I-phase Al alloys, improving the performance and longevity of coated surfaces.

Implementation Method 1

Friction Surface Additive Manufacturing process

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

forming a metallic coating of the first material from the deposition rod onto the workpiece

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDeposition: Deposition (physical)

Data Source

PatentEP4349520A1Corrosion protection using metallic coating
Publication Date: 2024.04.10 GOODRICH CORP
  • EP4349520A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4349520A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4349520A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method of forming a metallic coating a workpiece is disclosed herein. The method includes receiving a sacrificial deposition rod formed of a first material, receiving a workpiece of a second material, forming a coating of the first material from the sacrificial deposition rod onto the workpiece, the coating having a first thickness, and machining the coating to a second thickness that is less than the first thickness.