Automated Metallic Matrix Shaping via Least Square Flatness Control
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing methods for shaping metallic matrices are inefficient and manual, relying on human intervention to achieve the required flatness, which can be inconsistent and time-consuming.
Innovation Solution
A method involving a shape test device and controller that measures flatness using a least square method, determines the need for shaping based on error margins, and automates the reshaping process with a shaping device, ensuring precise calibration and repetitive adjustments until the desired flatness is achieved.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Manufacturing precision
If manual shaping is used to adjust flatness, then the work-piece can be reshaped to match qualifications, but the process is time-consuming and inconsistent
Solution Approach 1:
The patent replaces manual mechanical shaping operations with an automated shaping device controlled by a computer system. The system uses automated measurement and control to perform shaping operations, eliminating manual intervention and significantly reducing shaping time while maintaining consistent flatness quality.
Solution Approach 2:
The system enables self-service by automatically measuring the work-piece flatness, comparing it against specifications, determining required adjustments, and executing shaping operations without human intervention. The closed-loop control system continuously monitors and adjusts the shaping process autonomously.
2Manufacturing precision
If manual shaping is used to adjust flatness, then the work-piece can be reshaped to match qualifications, but human error reduces consistency
Solution Approach 1:
The patent replaces manual measurement and shaping operations with automated systems. A shape test device automatically measures flatness at multiple points, and a computer-controlled shaping device performs adjustments, eliminating human error and ensuring consistent, reliable results across all work-pieces.
Solution Approach 2:
The system implements feedback by continuously measuring the work-piece flatness, comparing measurements against target specifications, and automatically adjusting shaping parameters based on the measured deviations. This closed-loop feedback ensures consistent and reliable flatness control.
3Productivity
If automated shaping device is introduced, then shaping efficiency and consistency are improved, but device complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent integrates multiple functions into a unified automated system. The same computer control system performs measurement data processing, shaping parameter calculation, and device control, while the shaping device handles both measurement and adjustment operations, improving productivity without proportionally increasing complexity.
Solution Approach 2:
The system merges the measurement device and shaping device into an integrated automated system controlled by a single computer. This consolidation allows the system to perform both measurement and shaping operations efficiently, improving productivity while managing complexity through unified control.
Data Source
AI summary
A metallic matrix shaping method is provided. A flatness of a plurality of points of the metallic matrix is measured by a shape test device, and a flatness margin of error H between a reference level and the flatness of the metallic matrix is calibrated using the least square method. A controller determines whether the points of the metallic matrix need to be shaped by comparing the flatness margin of error H and a permissive error range K. The controller calibrates a descending distance P by a mathematical formula of P=M+[(H−K)/D]/N+L. A shaping device shapes the metallic matrix according to the descending distance P and a shaping time. The above steps are repeated until the flatness of the metal is within the permissive error range K.