Metallic Touch Sensor Assembly for Cooking Apparatus Recognition Rate

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cooking apparatuses with touch control panels face limitations due to the restriction of using glass for the exterior and capacitive sensors, which can lead to reduced recognition rates for touch operations.

Innovation Solution

A cooking apparatus with an exterior formed from metallic materials, featuring a touch sensor assembly where the touching part is machined using etching or laser processing, and an inclined surface to enhance recognition rates, including a guide case and elastic support for the touch module to ensure accurate and durable operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a glass panel with capacitive sensor is used for the control panel, then the control panel structure is simple, but the exterior design is restricted and recognition rate of touch operation is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecognition rate of touch operationVSAvoidcontrol panel structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameter from glass to metallic material, and changes the sensor type from capacitive to piezoelectric sensor. This parameter change enables better exterior design flexibility with metallic materials while piezoelectric sensors provide higher touch recognition rates and reliability, resolving the contradiction between reliability improvement and structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the capacitive sensor system with a piezoelectric sensor system. Piezoelectric sensors detect mechanical pressure directly through piezoelectric effect, providing more reliable and accurate touch recognition compared to capacitive sensors, thus improving the recognition rate without significantly increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Shape

If a metallic material is used for the exterior, then the exterior design is improved, but the material is harder to deform for touch sensor contact

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexterior designVSAvoiddeformability for touch contact
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating a touching part with different local properties on the metallic exterior. The touching part is formed with a machined pattern that increases local flexibility and deformability, allowing it to contact the piezoelectric sensor effectively, while the rest of the metallic exterior maintains its aesthetic design and structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the metallic exterior into different functional zones: the main exterior body for aesthetic purposes and the touching part for sensor interaction. The touching part is further segmented into patterns that enhance deformability, allowing the hard metallic material to locally deform for touch contact while maintaining overall structural rigidity and design quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Strength

If the touching part is made thicker for durability, then strength is improved, but recognition rate of touch operation is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedurability of touching partVSAvoidrecognition rate of touch operation
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses curved or patterned surface designs on the touching part rather than flat surfaces. The curvature and patterning allow the touching part to deform more easily under touch while maintaining sufficient structural strength and durability, thereby improving touch recognition rate without sacrificing durability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes the thickness parameter of the touching part to achieve a balance between strength and deformability. Rather than making it uniformly thick, the touching part is designed with optimized thickness distribution and machined patterns that provide adequate strength for durability while allowing sufficient deformation for reliable piezoelectric sensor activation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The metallic exterior and enhanced touch sensor assembly improve the recognition rate of touch operations, allowing for more convenient and reliable input, while preventing simultaneous key presses and maintaining performance over time.

Implementation Method 1

a piezoelectric sensor which generates an electricity according to a pressure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoelectric effect: Piezoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentEP3256787B1Cooking apparatus with touch sensor assembly
Publication Date: 2020.05.06 LG ELECTRONICS INC
  • EP3256787B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3256787B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3256787B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

Disclosed are a cooking apparatus and a touch sensor assembly. The touch sensor assembly according to an embodiment of the present invention includes an outer cover formed of a metallic material and configured to form a part of an exterior of the cooking apparatus; and a touch module installed to be in contact with a rear surface of the outer cover, and having a plurality of touch sensors, wherein a touching part which is formed by machining a rear surface of the outer cover which is in contact with the touch sensor, and easily elastically deformed when being touched by a user, and thus transfers a pressure to the touch sensor is formed.