Metal Working Process Control for Dynamic Parameter Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Industrial machining operations face challenges in optimizing performance criteria due to dynamic variables such as logistics, material properties, and operator needs, leading to inefficiencies, precision issues, and increased waste, especially in sheet metal working processes.

Innovation Solution

A method that integrates multiple data sources to dynamically monitor and control machining processes, using real-time information to adjust process parameters and performance variables, optimizing operation criteria for improved productivity and reducing waste.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional production methods with individual part definitions are used, then manufacturing precision is maintained, but productivity is reduced and material waste increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoidmaterial waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple individual part definitions into a single unified production program that processes multiple parts simultaneously. The system combines separate cutting, punching, and pressing operations into one integrated program, allowing the machine to produce multiple parts in a single cycle rather than processing each part individually, thereby increasing productivity and reducing material waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a universal production program that can handle multiple different part types and operations within a single program. The system is designed to accommodate various cutting patterns, punching operations, and pressing tasks in one unified program structure, making the machine system versatile and capable of producing diverse parts without requiring separate specialized programs for each operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If common cut technology is used to increase productivity, then productivity is improved, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to cut width constraints

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoidmanufacturing precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamic adjustment of cutting parameters and positioning based on real-time machine status and part requirements. The system dynamically selects optimal cutting paths and adjusts feed rates, cutting depths, and positioning accuracy according to the specific geometric characteristics of each part and the current state of the machine, thereby maintaining high precision while achieving improved productivity through common cut operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes in the cutting process by adjusting cutting speed, feed rate, and tool path parameters based on part geometry and material properties. The system modifies these parameters dynamically during operation to optimize both precision and productivity, allowing common cut operations to maintain acceptable tolerances while increasing overall production efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If dynamic optimization is implemented to respond to varying conditions, then productivity is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms that monitor machine status, part quality, and process parameters in real-time, using this information to dynamically adjust subsequent operations. The system collects data from sensors and machine controllers, analyzes this feedback information, and automatically modifies cutting paths, feed rates, and positioning to optimize productivity while maintaining precision, thereby managing complexity through intelligent control rather than mechanical complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables the machine system to automatically optimize its own operation through self-adjusting algorithms that respond to changing conditions without external intervention. The control system autonomously selects optimal parameters, adjusts tool paths, and manages production scheduling based on real-time data, reducing the need for complex manual programming and external control systems while improving productivity through adaptive optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11103909B2Method and machine system for controlling an industrial operation
Publication Date: 2021.08.31 TOMOLOGIC
  • US11103909B2 patent drawing
  • US11103909B2 patent drawing
  • US11103909B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for selecting optimum operation performance criteria for a metal working process. The method includes the step of developing a process model relating process parameters for the operation with performance variables for said operation, wherein the process parameters and performance variables are retrievable via integrated multiple data sources, and selecting at least one optimization technique to define a function, said function including process parameters. Moreover, the method includes generating the function for optimization by using acceptable tolerances of a product to be machined as a basis to define ranges for performance variables along with ranges for process parameters, and applying the at least one optimization technique to said function, whereby optimum operation performance criteria are calculated for the process model including process parameters and performance variables to obtain a set of requirements to be used for controlling the metal working process.