Tunable Metamaterial Impedance Optimization via Rational Functions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for optimizing radiation patterns in tunable metamaterial devices face challenges in efficiently finding global optima due to computational intensity, especially as the number of tunable elements increases, leading to prohibitively expensive optimization problems.

Innovation Solution

The use of rational multivariate functions and impedance matrices allows for the simplification of optimization problems, enabling the calculation of global maximums by solving linear system simulations, and dynamic tuning of impedance elements to achieve target radiation patterns.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional optimization methods are used to find global optima in tunable metamaterial devices, then optimization accuracy can be achieved, but computational complexity increases prohibitively as the number of tunable elements increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the optimization problem by changing parameters from individual element tuning to impedance matrix-based global optimization. By using rational multivariate functions to represent the relationship between impedance parameters and radiation patterns, the system achieves global optima with linear scaling computational complexity rather than exponential scaling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional iterative numerical optimization methods with an analytical solution approach using rational multivariate functions. This substitution eliminates the need for computationally intensive iterative searches and directly provides closed-form solutions for optimal impedance values, significantly reducing computational burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If the number of tunable elements in metamaterial devices is increased to achieve better radiation pattern control, then radiation pattern precision is improved, but the optimization problem becomes prohibitively expensive computationally

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveradiation pattern precisionVSAvoidoptimization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal optimization framework using impedance matrices that can handle any number of tunable elements through a single linear system solution. The rational multivariate function approach provides a multi-functional solution that works for different device configurations and sizes without requiring separate optimization algorithms for each case.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the complex optimization problem into manageable components by representing the system through impedance matrices and rational multivariate functions. This segmentation allows the large-scale optimization problem to be decomposed into smaller linear system simulations that can be solved efficiently and scaled to any device size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If real-time tuning capability is implemented in metamaterial devices, then adaptability is improved, but computational requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time tuning capabilityVSAvoidcomputational energy requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-calculating the rational multivariate functions that describe the system behavior. These pre-computed functions enable real-time tuning by simply evaluating the analytical expressions rather than performing full optimization calculations, dramatically reducing the computational energy required during actual operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system achieves self-service through the analytical nature of the rational multivariate function solution. Once the functions are established, the system can autonomously determine optimal impedance values for any desired radiation pattern without requiring external computational resources or iterative optimization processes, enabling energy-efficient real-time adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10063101B2Wireless power transfer using tunable metamaterial systems and methods
Publication Date: 2018.08.28 METAVC PATENT HOLDING CO
  • US10063101B2 patent drawing
  • US10063101B2 patent drawing
  • US10063101B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides system and methods for optimizing the tuning of impedance elements associate with sub-wavelength antenna elements to attain target radiation and/or field patterns. A scattering matrix (S-Matrix) of field amplitudes for each of a plurality of modeled lumped ports, N, may be determined that includes a plurality of lumped antenna ports, Na, with impedance values corresponding to the impedance values of associated impedance elements and at least one modeled external port, Ne, located external to the antenna system at a specified radius vector. Impedance values may be identified through an optimization process, and the impedance elements may be tuned (dynamically or statically) to attain a specific target radiation pattern.