Metamodel Weight Generation for Neural Network Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing analytics solutions for manufacturing processes are custom-developed for specific environments, making it costly and time-consuming to adapt models for different deployment conditions, such as changes in lighting, camera placement, or production line conditions, and data drift can lead to decreased model performance.

Innovation Solution

A method involving meta learning to generate models for a second environment based on models from a first environment by training a metamodel using weights from both environments, allowing for the transformation of weights to adapt models for new tasks and environments without extensive retraining or labeling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If analytics solutions are custom developed for one line and product, then model performance is optimized for that specific environment, but system integration complexity and deployment cost increase when modifying the solution for another line or product

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel performanceVSAvoidsystem integration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal analytics solution framework that can be deployed across multiple production lines and products. Instead of custom-developing separate models for each environment, the system uses a single unified model that adapts to different deployment conditions through automated retraining and environment-specific parameter adjustment, eliminating the need for extensive system integration for each new deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adjusts model parameters and training configurations based on deployment environment characteristics such as lighting conditions, camera placement, and production line speed. By dynamically changing these parameters rather than creating entirely new models, the system maintains high performance across different environments while minimizing integration complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If models are developed specifically for a first environment, then accuracy is high for that environment, but deployment time and cost increase when adapting to a second environment with different conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoiddeployment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-training models on diverse synthetic data that covers multiple environmental conditions before actual deployment. This pre-training prepares the model to adapt quickly to specific environments through minimal fine-tuning, significantly reducing deployment time while maintaining high accuracy across different settings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses synthetic data generation to create virtual copies of various production environments, allowing models to be trained and tested across multiple scenarios before deployment. This copying approach enables the model to learn from diverse conditions without requiring extensive real-world data collection and labeling for each new deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Ease of manufacture

If the same set of models is reused for a second environment with different deployment conditions, then deployment cost is reduced, but model accuracy decreases when conditions differ significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment costVSAvoidmodel accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic model adaptation where the system automatically detects changes in deployment conditions and retrain s or adjusts the model accordingly. This dynamic approach allows the same base model to be reused across different environments while maintaining accuracy through automated adjustments based on real-time environment monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms that monitor model performance in the deployment environment and automatically trigger retraining or parameter adjustment when performance degradation is detected. This closed-loop system ensures that reused models maintain high accuracy by continuously adapting to environmental changes without requiring manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Measurement precision

If new models are developed for a second environment through extensive data annotation, then model accuracy is maintained, but time and cost consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoiddata annotation effort
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service mechanisms where the system automatically generates synthetic training data and performs self-supervised learning to adapt to new environments without requiring extensive manual data annotation. The model uses unlabeled data from the target environment to learn environment-specific characteristics, significantly reducing the need for time-consuming manual labeling while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20240054336A1Model scaling for multiple environments using minimum system integration
Publication Date: 2024.02.15 HITACHI LTD
  • US20240054336A1 patent drawing
  • US20240054336A1 patent drawing
  • US20240054336A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In example implementations described herein, there are systems and methods for generating at least a first set of weights for a first neural network associated with a first task performed in a first environment and a second set of weights for a second neural network associated with the first task performed in a second environment; training a metamodel based on at least the first set of weights and the second set of weights; and generating, based on the metamodel, a third set of weights for a third neural network associated with a second task in the second environment.