Metasurface Design Flow for Fabrication Artifacts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Designing metalenses and other optical metasurfaces for high-volume manufacturing is challenging due to discrepancies between nominal and actual geometries of fabricated nano-scale features, leading to deviations from the desired optical effects.

Innovation Solution

A manufacturing-aware design flow that utilizes a library of meta-atoms accounting for fabrication artifacts such as corner rounding and side-wall angle deviations, allowing for optimization and simulation based on actual geometries rather than idealized shapes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If idealized meta-atom geometries are used in design, then optical performance simulation is simplified, but fabrication accuracy deteriorates due to unaccounted manufacturing artifacts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign simplicityVSAvoidgeometry accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-calculating and incorporating fabrication artifacts into the design process itself. Manufacturing-aware meta-atoms are generated in advance with built-in corrections for corner rounding and side-wall angles, so that when these artifacts are fabricated, they automatically match the intended optical performance without requiring post-fabrication adjustments or iterative redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of meta-atoms by introducing fabrication-artifact-aware variations in corner radii and side-wall angles. Instead of using idealized sharp corners and vertical walls, the design incorporates specific rounded corner radii and tilted side-wall angles that account for photolithographic and etching process characteristics, thereby bridging the gap between design intent and fabricated reality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If manufacturing artifacts are accounted for in design, then fabrication accuracy improves, but design complexity increases due to need for artifact prediction and correction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeometry accuracyVSAvoiddesign process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses copying by creating a library of pre-characterized manufacturing-aware meta-atoms that replicate actual fabricated geometries. These copies include realistic corner rounding and side-wall angle deviations, allowing the design system to work with accurate representations of what will be fabricated rather than requiring complex real-time artifact prediction algorithms during each design iteration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-calculating and incorporating fabrication artifacts into the design process itself. Manufacturing-aware meta-atoms are generated in advance with built-in corrections for corner rounding and side-wall angles, so that when these artifacts are fabricated, they automatically match the intended optical performance without requiring post-fabrication adjustments or iterative redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If multiple design iterations are performed to account for fabrication variations, then manufacturing precision improves, but development time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance matching accuracyVSAvoiddesign iteration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-calculating and incorporating fabrication artifacts into the design process itself. Manufacturing-aware meta-atoms are generated in advance with built-in corrections for corner rounding and side-wall angles, so that when these artifacts are fabricated, they automatically match the intended optical performance without requiring post-fabrication adjustments or iterative redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by using measured or simulated fabrication artifact data (corner radii, side-wall angles) to directly inform and adjust the design parameters of meta-atoms during the design process. This closed-loop approach ensures that the design accounts for actual manufacturing behavior, eliminating the need for time-consuming trial-and-error iterations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250076640A1Optical and manufacturing aware design flow for metasurfaces
Publication Date: 2025.03.06 KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US20250076640A1 patent drawing
  • US20250076640A1 patent drawing
  • US20250076640A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes receiving a metasurface design including a plurality of meta-atoms arranged to modify phases of incident waves, the plurality of meta-atoms being from a library of different nominal meta-atoms; generating, by a processing device, a library of manufacturing-aware meta-atoms based on the library of different nominal meta-atoms; and generating instructions for fabricating a manufacturing-aware metasurface having layout computed using a cost function based on the metasurface design and the library of manufacturing-aware meta-atoms.